Alqarni Abdullah M, Schneiders Anthony G, Cook Chad E, Hendrick Paul A
Department of Physiotherapy, King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
School of Human, Health and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Branyan, Australia.
Phys Ther Sport. 2015 Aug;16(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2014.12.005. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
The aim of this paper was to systematically review the diagnostic ability of clinical tests to detect lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. A systematic literature search of six databases, with no language restrictions, from 1950 to 2014 was concluded on February 1, 2014. Clinical tests were required to be compared against imaging reference standards and report, or allow computation, of common diagnostic values. The systematic search yielded a total of 5164 articles with 57 retained for full-text examination, from which 4 met the full inclusion criteria for the review. Study heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis of included studies. Fifteen different clinical tests were evaluated for their ability to diagnose lumbar spondylolisthesis and one test for its ability to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis. The one-legged hyperextension test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity (50%-73%) and low specificity (17%-32%) to diagnose lumbar spondylolysis, while the lumbar spinous process palpation test was the optimal diagnostic test for lumbar spondylolisthesis; returning high specificity (87%-100%) and moderate to high sensitivity (60-88) values. Lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis are identifiable causes of LBP in athletes. There appears to be utility to lumbar spinous process palpation for the diagnosis of lumbar spondylolisthesis, however the one-legged hyperextension test has virtually no value in diagnosing patients with spondylolysis.
本文旨在系统评价临床检查对腰椎峡部裂和腰椎滑脱的诊断能力。于2014年2月1日完成了对6个数据库从1950年至2014年的系统文献检索,检索无语言限制。要求临床检查与影像学参考标准进行比较,并报告或允许计算常见诊断值。系统检索共获得5164篇文章,其中57篇留作全文审查,4篇符合该综述的完全纳入标准。研究的异质性妨碍了对纳入研究进行荟萃分析。对15种不同的临床检查诊断腰椎滑脱的能力进行了评估,对1种检查诊断腰椎峡部裂的能力进行了评估。单腿过伸试验诊断腰椎峡部裂的敏感性低至中度(50%-73%),特异性低(17%-32%),而腰椎棘突触诊试验是诊断腰椎滑脱的最佳诊断试验,特异性高(87%-100%),敏感性中度至高(60%-88%)。腰椎峡部裂和腰椎滑脱是运动员腰痛的可识别原因。腰椎棘突触诊对诊断腰椎滑脱似乎有用,然而单腿过伸试验在诊断腰椎峡部裂患者方面几乎没有价值。