Suppr超能文献

与全身麻醉相比,髋部骨折手术的区域麻醉与明显更多的围手术期并发症相关。

Regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery is associated with significantly more peri-operative complications compared with general anaesthesia.

作者信息

Whiting Paul S, Molina Cesar S, Greenberg Sarah E, Thakore Rachel V, Obremskey William T, Sethi Manish K

机构信息

The Vanderbilt Orthopaedic Institute Center for Health Policy, 1215 21st Avenue South, Suite 4200, Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA,

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1321-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2735-5. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although several studies have advocated the use of regional versus general anaesthesia as a means of reducing peri-operative complications from hip fracture surgery, the ideal method of anaesthesia remains controversial. Our purpose was to investigate the association between anaesthesia type and peri-operative complications in hip fracture surgery.

METHODS

From the 2005-2011 ACS-NSQIP database, all patients with operatively treated hip fractures were identified using CPT codes, and fifteen peri-operative complications were recorded and categorized as either minor or major. Rates of minor, major, and total complications by anaesthesia type were compared using chi-square and Fischer's exact tests. A multivariate model was used to determine odds of minor, major, and total complications between anaesthesia types. Multivariate analysis was then repeated after combining patients who received regional nerve blocks or spinal anaesthesia.

RESULTS

A total of 7,764 hip fracture patients were included in our analysis. Spinal anaesthesia had the highest total complication rate (19.6%), followed by general (17.9%) and regional nerve blocks (12.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly greater odds of minor complications and total complications compared with general anaesthesia. After combining the regional nerve block and spinal anaesthesia groups, multivariate analysis again showed significantly greater odds of minor and total complications with regional versus general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large multi-centre database, we demonstrate that regional anaesthesia was associated with significantly greater odds of minor and total peri-operative complications compared with general anaesthesia. Our results challenge the notion that regional anaesthesia is the preferred method of anaesthesia for hip fractures in the elderly.

摘要

引言

尽管多项研究主张采用区域麻醉而非全身麻醉来降低髋部骨折手术的围手术期并发症,但理想的麻醉方法仍存在争议。我们的目的是研究麻醉类型与髋部骨折手术围手术期并发症之间的关联。

方法

从2005 - 2011年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS - NSQIP)数据库中,使用现行程序编码(CPT)识别所有接受手术治疗的髋部骨折患者,并记录15种围手术期并发症,并将其分类为轻微或严重。使用卡方检验和费舍尔精确检验比较不同麻醉类型的轻微、严重和总并发症发生率。使用多变量模型确定不同麻醉类型之间轻微、严重和总并发症的几率。在合并接受区域神经阻滞或脊髓麻醉的患者后,再次进行多变量分析。

结果

我们共纳入7764例髋部骨折患者进行分析。脊髓麻醉的总并发症发生率最高(19.6%),其次是全身麻醉(17.9%)和区域神经阻滞(12.6%)。多变量分析表明,与全身麻醉相比,脊髓麻醉与轻微并发症和总并发症的几率显著更高相关联。在合并区域神经阻滞和脊髓麻醉组后,多变量分析再次显示区域麻醉与全身麻醉相比轻微和总并发症的几率显著更高。

结论

通过使用一个大型多中心数据库,我们证明与全身麻醉相比,区域麻醉与轻微和总围手术期并发症的几率显著更高相关联。我们的结果挑战了区域麻醉是老年髋部骨折首选麻醉方法的观念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验