Suppr超能文献

鼻科学领域的诉讼

Litigation in English rhinology.

作者信息

Harris A S, Edwards S J, Pope L

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology,Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Health Board,Swansea,Wales,UK.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2015 Mar;129(3):244-9. doi: 10.1017/S0022215115000286.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Litigation is a rising financial burden on the National Health Service. This study aims to show if litigation is increasing in rhinology and which procedures lead to the most claims.

METHODS

Ten years of data were obtained from the National Health Service Litigation Authority. Rhinology claims were examined for cost, injury, diagnosis and operation type.

RESULTS

Of the 123 rhinology claims identified, 52 per cent were successful. There was a 56 per cent increase in the average annual number of claims between the first half of the study period and the second (p = 0.0451). The commonest reasons for a claim were poor cosmesis (15.6 per cent) and lack of informed consent (14 per cent).

CONCLUSION

The number of claims in rhinology increased over the study period. Most claims resulted from poor cosmetic outcome, lack of consent or recognised complications. It is suggested that enhanced communication and management of patient expectations could reduce litigation and improve patient satisfaction.

摘要

目的

诉讼给国民医疗服务体系带来日益沉重的经济负担。本研究旨在表明鼻科学领域的诉讼是否在增加,以及哪些手术引发的索赔最多。

方法

从国民医疗服务诉讼管理局获取了十年的数据。对鼻科学索赔的费用、损伤情况、诊断及手术类型进行了审查。

结果

在确定的123例鼻科学索赔中,52%获得成功。研究期前半段与后半段之间,索赔的年均数量增长了56%(p = 0.0451)。索赔的最常见原因是美容效果差(15.6%)和缺乏知情同意(14%)。

结论

在研究期间,鼻科学领域的索赔数量有所增加。大多数索赔是由美容效果不佳、缺乏同意或公认的并发症导致的。建议加强沟通并管理患者期望以减少诉讼并提高患者满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验