Komine Osamu, Suzuki Hideyuki, Watanabe Masanori, Nomura Satoshi, Mizutani Satoshi, Yoshino Masanori, Chihara Naoto, Mishima Keisuke, Oyama Rina, Uchida Eiji
Institute of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital.
J Nippon Med Sch. 2015;82(1):43-9. doi: 10.1272/jnms.82.43.
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has gained increasing attention due to its potential to improve the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. However, the technique remains technically challenging for most surgeons. We developed a new technique utilizing a needle grasper held in the surgeon's left hand as an alternative to conventional single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC).
From August 2011 through May 2013, 29 patients at Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, with gallbladder stones or polyps underwent single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with an additional needle grasper that was held in the surgeon's left hand (SILCAN) and introduced in the right subcostal region without a trocar. We analyzed intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of 29 patients for whom SILCAN was performed and retrospectively compared these outcomes to those of 32 patients who underwent conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) from January 2011 through May 2013.
No differences in patient characteristics or intraoperative/postoperative outcomes were observed between the groups. None of the patients in either group required conversion to an open procedure or additional ports. In the SILCAN group, no patients had complications within the first 4 weeks after surgery, with the exception of 1 patient with severe chronic cholecystitis in whom bile duct stenosis developed due to inadvertent clipping of the common hepatic duct. The frequency of postoperative analgesic use was similar in both groups, although none of the patients in the SILCAN group received analgesics for pain from the small, inconspicuous wound in the right subcostal region.
SILCAN is a safe and feasible alternative to SILC which does not compromise the qualities of CLC. It is less technically challenging, and postoperative pain and cosmesis are comparable to those of conventional SILC.
单孔腹腔镜手术因其可能改善腹腔镜手术的益处而越来越受到关注。然而,该技术对大多数外科医生来说在技术上仍然具有挑战性。我们开发了一种新技术,利用外科医生左手持有的抓针器作为传统单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)的替代方法。
2011年8月至2013年5月,日本医科大学武藏小杉医院的29例患有胆囊结石或息肉的患者接受了单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC),并额外使用了外科医生左手持有的抓针器(SILCAN),且未通过套管针在右肋下区域进行操作。我们分析了29例行SILCAN手术患者的术中及术后结果,并将这些结果与2011年1月至2013年5月接受传统四孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)的32例患者的结果进行回顾性比较。
两组患者的特征或术中/术后结果均未观察到差异。两组患者均无需转为开放手术或增加切口。在SILCAN组中,除1例患有严重慢性胆囊炎的患者因无意中夹闭肝总管而发生胆管狭窄外,术后4周内无患者出现并发症。两组术后镇痛药物的使用频率相似,尽管SILCAN组中没有患者因右肋下区域小而不明显的伤口疼痛而接受镇痛治疗。
SILCAN是SILC的一种安全可行的替代方法,不会影响CLC的质量。它在技术上的挑战性较小,术后疼痛和美观效果与传统SILC相当。