Suppr超能文献

噻唑烷二酮类药物和二甲双胍的使用与糖尿病退伍军人良性前列腺增生的风险

Thiazolidinedione and Metformin Use and the Risk of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia in Veterans with Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Murff Harvey J, Roumie Christianne L, Greevy Robert A, Grijalva Carlos G, Hung Adrianna H, Liu Xulei, Griffin Marie R

机构信息

Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC), HSR&D Center, Nashville, TN ; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Veterans Health Administration-Tennessee Valley Healthcare System Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC), HSR&D Center, Nashville, TN ; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN.

出版信息

J Mens Health. 2014 Dec 1;11(4):157-162. doi: 10.1089/jomh.2014.0051.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic inflammation is important in the development of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and certain oral antidiabetic medications have anti-inflammatory properties. The purpose of this study was to determine if use of thiazolidinediones or metformin was associated with a reduced risk of requiring medical or surgical treatment for BPH compared to sulfonylureas among diabetic men.

METHODS

We constructed a retrospective cohort of 192,457 male veterans newly prescribed either rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, metformin, or a sulfonylurea. We used Cox proportional hazard regression to assess the association between thiazolidinedione or metformin use and the risk of requiring medical or surgical treatment for BPH compared to sulfonylurea use. New BPH treatment was defined by either a new prescription for a α-1 blocker or 5α-reductase inhibitors or a surgical procedure indicated for severe BPH.

RESULTS

In 259,995 person-years of follow up we identified 14,690 new treatments for BPH. After adjusting for covariates including age, HbA1c, and body mass index, we found no association between rosiglitazone (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.86, 1.20), pioglitazone (aHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.45, 1.38), or metformin use (aHR 0.99, 95% CI 0.94, 1.03) and risk of new medical or surgical treatment for BPH compared to sulfonylureas. Analyses ignoring prescriptions for non-selective α-1 blockers (terazosin, doxazosin, prazosin) from our BPH case definition (n = 11,079), yielded similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large cohort, we observed no association between the use of thiazolidinediones or metformin and new medical or surgical treatment for BPH compared to sulfonylureas.

摘要

背景

慢性炎症在良性前列腺增生(BPH)的发展中起重要作用,某些口服抗糖尿病药物具有抗炎特性。本研究的目的是确定与磺脲类药物相比,使用噻唑烷二酮类药物或二甲双胍是否与糖尿病男性因BPH需要药物或手术治疗的风险降低相关。

方法

我们构建了一个回顾性队列,纳入192,457名新开具罗格列酮、吡格列酮、二甲双胍或磺脲类药物处方的男性退伍军人。我们使用Cox比例风险回归来评估与使用磺脲类药物相比,使用噻唑烷二酮类药物或二甲双胍与因BPH需要药物或手术治疗的风险之间的关联。新的BPH治疗定义为新开具α-1受体阻滞剂或5α-还原酶抑制剂处方,或因严重BPH而进行的手术。

结果

在259,995人年的随访中,我们确定了14,690例新的BPH治疗病例。在调整了包括年龄、糖化血红蛋白和体重指数等协变量后,我们发现与磺脲类药物相比,罗格列酮(调整后风险比[aHR] 1.02,95%置信区间[CI] 0.86,1.20)、吡格列酮(aHR 0.79,95% CI 0.45,1.38)或二甲双胍的使用(aHR 0.99,95% CI 0.94,1.03)与新的BPH药物或手术治疗风险之间无关联。从我们的BPH病例定义中排除非选择性α-1受体阻滞剂(特拉唑嗪、多沙唑嗪、哌唑嗪)的处方(n = 11,079)进行分析,结果相似。

结论

在这个大型队列中,与磺脲类药物相比,我们观察到使用噻唑烷二酮类药物或二甲双胍与新的BPH药物或手术治疗之间无关联。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Executive summary: Standards of medical care in diabetes--2012.执行摘要:2012年糖尿病医疗护理标准
Diabetes Care. 2012 Jan;35 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4-S10. doi: 10.2337/dc12-s004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验