• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌治疗后手臂淋巴水肿的发生率及发生风险因素。

The incidence and risk factors for occurrence of arm lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer.

作者信息

Rebegea L, Firescu D, Dumitru M, Anghel R

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Jan-Feb;110(1):33-7.

PMID:25800313
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The arm lymphedema is reported as being the most frequent late reaction and complication that influences breast cancer patients'€™ quality of life after lymph node dissection and radiotherapy. The aim of the study is to identify the risk factors in arm lymphedema occurrence in breast cancer patients who performed radical conservatory surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analysed 305 breast cancer patients who underwent treatment in the "Sf. Ap. Andrei"€ Emergency Clinical Hospital, Galati, Radiotherapy and Oncology Department, between the 1st of January 2010 and 31st of December 2012. We tried to find the risk factors for arm lymphedema development after treatment of breast cancer: the association of adjuvant radiotherapy with surgery, chemotherapy,hormonal therapy, number of removed lymph nodes,and number of lymph nodes with metastases, the co-morbid illnesses (obesity, diabetes mellitus and high blood pressure).

RESULTS

Our study evidences that the association of adjuvant radiotherapy, including the lymph node regions, with radical or conservatory surgery with lymph node dissection represents a statistically significant risk factor, with relative risk, RR =1.87, 95%C.I.=1.39-€3.51, p<0.001. The number of removed lymph nodes was found to be a risk factor with statistical significance. For more than 25 removed lymph nodes, the relative risk for arm lymphedema development was RR=1.95(95%C.I. =1.79-4.51) and for 16-25 removed lymph nodes the relative risk, RR = 1.78, 95% C.I. = 1.46 - 3.23. Other analysed risk factors, which did not influence lymphedema development, were: associated chemotherapy or hormonal therapy,presence of co-morbid illnesses.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of arm lymphedema is an unpredictable occurrence that can happen years after axillary surgery.Breast and arm oedema continue to be late reactions that can be reduced by use of biopsy sentinel technique with avoiding of axillary lymph node dissection, when the sentinel lymph node is negative, knowing that lymphedema risk after sentinel lymph node is 5% comparative with lymphedema risk after axillary lymph node dissection which is 16%, by avoiding obesity, and performing modern therapy techniques.

摘要

背景

手臂淋巴水肿被报道为淋巴结清扫和放疗后影响乳腺癌患者生活质量的最常见晚期反应和并发症。本研究的目的是确定接受根治性保乳手术、化疗和放疗的乳腺癌患者发生手臂淋巴水肿的危险因素。

材料与方法

我们分析了2010年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间在加拉茨“圣安德烈”紧急临床医院放疗与肿瘤科接受治疗的305例乳腺癌患者。我们试图找出乳腺癌治疗后手臂淋巴水肿发生的危险因素:辅助放疗与手术、化疗、激素治疗的联合,切除淋巴结的数量,以及有转移的淋巴结数量,合并疾病(肥胖、糖尿病和高血压)。

结果

我们的研究表明,包括淋巴结区域的辅助放疗与根治性或保乳性淋巴结清扫手术联合是一个具有统计学意义的危险因素,相对危险度RR = 1.87,95%置信区间= 1.39 - 3.51,p < 0.001。发现切除淋巴结的数量是一个具有统计学意义的危险因素。切除超过25个淋巴结时,发生手臂淋巴水肿的相对危险度RR = 1.95(95%置信区间= 1.79 - 4.51),切除16 - 25个淋巴结时,相对危险度RR = 1.78,95%置信区间= 1.46 - 3.23。其他分析的危险因素,即不影响淋巴水肿发生的因素有:联合化疗或激素治疗,合并疾病的存在。

结论

手臂淋巴水肿的发生是不可预测的,可能在腋窝手术后数年出现。乳房和手臂水肿仍然是晚期反应,当前哨淋巴结为阴性时,可通过使用前哨活检技术避免腋窝淋巴结清扫来降低其发生率,要知道前哨淋巴结活检后淋巴水肿的风险为5%,而腋窝淋巴结清扫后淋巴水肿的风险为16%,通过避免肥胖以及采用现代治疗技术来实现。

相似文献

1
The incidence and risk factors for occurrence of arm lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer.乳腺癌治疗后手臂淋巴水肿的发生率及发生风险因素。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015 Jan-Feb;110(1):33-7.
2
Obesity is a risk factor for developing postoperative lymphedema in breast cancer patients.肥胖是乳腺癌患者术后发生淋巴水肿的一个风险因素。
Breast J. 2010 Jan-Feb;16(1):48-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00855.x. Epub 2009 Nov 2.
3
The influence of axillary reverse mapping related factors on lymphedema in breast cancer patients.腋窝反向绘图相关因素对乳腺癌患者淋巴水肿的影响。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jul;40(7):818-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
[Optimal treatment of the axilla after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early invasive breast cancer. Early results of the OTOASOR trial].[早期浸润性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检阳性后腋窝的最佳治疗。OTOASOR试验的早期结果]
Orv Hetil. 2013 Dec 8;154(49):1934-42. doi: 10.1556/OH.2013.29765.
5
Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment, including sentinel lymph node biopsy.乳腺癌治疗后发生的淋巴水肿,包括前哨淋巴结活检术后的淋巴水肿。
Lymphology. 2004 Jun;37(2):73-91.
6
Breast cancer related lymphedema in patients with different loco-regional treatments.不同局部区域治疗的乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿。
Breast. 2012 Jun;21(3):361-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Residual lymph node disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts an increased risk of lymphedema in node-positive breast cancer patients.新辅助化疗后残余淋巴结疾病可预测淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者发生淋巴水肿的风险增加。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;20(9):2835-41. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2828-y. Epub 2013 May 21.
8
Can axillary reverse mapping avoid lymphedema in node positive breast cancer patients?腋窝反向绘图能否避免淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的淋巴水肿?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;39(8):880-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
9
Sentinel node biopsy and quality of life measures in a Chinese population.中国人群中的前哨淋巴结活检与生活质量评估
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;35(9):921-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
10
Arm morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection: a study from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.前哨淋巴结活检或腋窝淋巴结清扫术后的手臂并发症:丹麦乳腺癌协作组的一项研究
Breast. 2008 Apr;17(2):138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Oct 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Supraclavicular Irradiation Induces Lymphedema in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Axillary Lymph Node Dissection and Taxane-Containing Chemotherapy.锁骨上照射会在接受腋窝淋巴结清扫和含紫杉烷化疗的乳腺癌患者中诱发淋巴水肿。
Breast J. 2024 Jul 31;2024:3250143. doi: 10.1155/2024/3250143. eCollection 2024.
2
Management of lymphedema is really a matter in patients with breast cancer.淋巴水肿的管理对于乳腺癌患者来说确实是个问题。
World J Clin Cases. 2024 May 26;12(15):2482-2486. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i15.2482.
3
Development of a core outcome set for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a Delphi study.
制定乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的核心结局集:一项德尔菲研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jun;205(2):359-370. doi: 10.1007/s10549-024-07262-5. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Risk factors for long-term arm morbidities following breast cancer treatments: A systematic review.乳腺癌治疗后上肢长期并发症的风险因素:系统评价。
Oncotarget. 2023 Dec 1;14:921-942. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28539.
5
Pre- and Post-Microsurgical Rehabilitation Interventions and Outcomes on Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: a Systematic Review.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的显微外科术前和术后康复干预及结果:系统评价。
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 Sep;25(9):1031-1046. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01439-9. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
6
Effect of progressive resistance exercise using Thera-band on edema volume, upper limb function, and quality of life in patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema.使用弹力带进行渐进性抗阻训练对乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者水肿体积、上肢功能及生活质量的影响。
J Exerc Rehabil. 2023 Apr 27;19(2):105-113. doi: 10.12965/jer.2346046.023. eCollection 2023 Apr.
7
Visual analysis of global research output of lymphedema based on bibliometrics.基于文献计量学的淋巴水肿全球研究产出可视化分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 5;12:926237. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.926237. eCollection 2022.
8
Study protocol for a 10-year prospective observational study, examining lymphoedema and patient-reported outcome after breast reconstruction.一项为期 10 年的前瞻性观察研究方案,旨在研究乳腺癌重建术后淋巴水肿和患者报告结局。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 6;11(12):e052676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052676.
9
Axillary ultrasonography combined with pre-operative wire localisation of clipped node in nodal restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer patients: a pilot study.腋部超声联合术前导丝定位在新辅助化疗后阳性淋巴结乳腺癌患者淋巴结分期中的应用:一项初步研究。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Nov 1;94(1127):20210788. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210788. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
10
Lymphoedema After Breast Cancer Treatment is Associated With Higher Body Mass Index: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿与较高体重指数相关:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
East Afr Health Res J. 2019;3(2):178-192. doi: 10.24248/EAHRJ-D-19-00009. Epub 2019 Nov 29.