Nguyen Peggy L, Chang Jason J
Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Neurology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.072. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
Intravenous tissue-plasminogen activator remains the only U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Timely administration of fibrinolysis is balanced with the need for accurate diagnosis. Stroke mimics represent a heterogeneous group of patients presenting with acute-onset focal neurological deficits. If these patients arrive within the extended time window for acute stroke treatment, these stroke mimics may erroneously receive fibrinolytics.
This review explores the literature and presents strategies for differentiating stroke mimics.
Clinical outcome in stroke mimics receiving fibrinolytics is overwhelmingly better than their stroke counterparts. However, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage remains a real but rare possibility. Certain presenting complaints and epidemiological risk factors may help differentiate strokes from stroke mimics; however, detection of stroke often depends on presence of posterior vs. anterior circulation strokes. Availability of imaging modalities also assists in diagnosing stroke mimics, with magnetic resonance imaging offering the most sensitivity and specificity.
Stroke mimics remain a heterogeneous entity that is difficult to identify. All studies in the literature report that stroke mimics treated with intravenous fibrinolysis have better clinical outcome than their stroke counterparts. Although symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage remains a real threat, literature searches have identified only two cases of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in stroke mimics treated with fibrinolytics.
静脉注射组织型纤溶酶原激活剂仍然是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的唯一用于急性缺血性卒中的治疗方法。及时进行纤维蛋白溶解治疗需要与准确诊断的需求相平衡。类卒中患者表现为一组异质性群体,他们出现急性发作的局灶性神经功能缺损。如果这些患者在急性卒中治疗的延长时间窗内就诊,这些类卒中患者可能会错误地接受纤维蛋白溶解剂治疗。
本综述探讨相关文献并提出鉴别类卒中的策略。
接受纤维蛋白溶解剂治疗的类卒中患者的临床结局总体上优于真正卒中的患者。然而,有症状性颅内出血的风险仍然存在,虽然实际发生但很罕见。某些临床表现和流行病学危险因素可能有助于区分卒中和类卒中;然而,卒中的诊断通常取决于后循环卒中与前循环卒中的存在情况。影像学检查手段的可用性也有助于诊断类卒中,其中磁共振成像的敏感性和特异性最高。
类卒中仍然是一个难以识别的异质性实体。文献中的所有研究均报告,接受静脉纤维蛋白溶解治疗的类卒中患者的临床结局优于真正卒中的患者。尽管有症状性颅内出血仍然是一个现实威胁,但文献检索仅发现两例接受纤维蛋白溶解剂治疗的类卒中患者发生有症状性颅内出血的病例。