• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非工作时间儿科护理与急诊科护理的比较:一项回顾性费用分析。

After-hours pediatric care compared with emergency department care: a retrospective charge analysis.

作者信息

Goodrich Shea, Evans Joseph, Gress Todd, Werthammer Joseph

机构信息

Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.

Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA

出版信息

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Apr;54(4):324-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922815574678.

DOI:10.1177/0009922815574678
PMID:25802419
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare financial charges between children treated and released from an emergency department (ED) with those evaluated in an after-hours (AH) pediatric clinic.

METHODS

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 200 children <15 years of age treated in a hospital-based ED and compared with 200 children seen in an AH pediatric clinic. Our main outcome was median overall patient charges by clinic setting. We additionally examined charges by the 6 most common disease diagnoses.

RESULTS

Median charges for children treated and released from the ED were $457 [interquartile range (IQR) $320-$628] compared with $140 (IQR $140-$140) for those treated in the AH clinic (P < .01). In addition, median charges were higher for the ED group in the 6 most common disease classes shared between the 2 study groups, both overall and for individual disease class comparison between study groups (all P < .01). We examined the association between charges and clinic setting in multiple quantile regression model while simultaneously adjusting for age, gender, insurance status, and diagnosis. Median costs were $305 (95% CI = $261 to $348; P < .01) more for the ED compared with the AH group.

CONCLUSION

We found that financial charges for pediatric health care delivered in an AH clinic were less than those in an ED. We found significantly higher charges for the ED when like diagnoses were compared. Patients should be encouraged to attend AH clinics for urgent care needs when appropriate, which could result in significant cost savings to the health care system.

摘要

目的

比较在急诊科(ED)接受治疗并出院的儿童与在非工作时间(AH)儿科诊所接受评估的儿童的费用。

方法

对一家医院急诊科治疗的200名15岁以下儿童的病历进行回顾性审查,并与在AH儿科诊所就诊的200名儿童进行比较。我们的主要结果是各诊所环境下患者的总体费用中位数。我们还检查了6种最常见疾病诊断的费用。

结果

在急诊科接受治疗并出院的儿童的费用中位数为457美元[四分位间距(IQR)320 - 628美元],而在AH诊所接受治疗的儿童的费用中位数为140美元(IQR 140 - 140美元)(P <.01)。此外,在两个研究组共有的6种最常见疾病类别中,急诊科组的费用中位数总体上以及在研究组之间的个体疾病类别比较中均更高(所有P <.01)。我们在多变量分位数回归模型中检查了费用与诊所环境之间的关联,同时调整了年龄、性别、保险状况和诊断因素。与AH组相比,急诊科组的费用中位数高出305美元(95%CI = 261美元至348美元;P <.01)。

结论

我们发现,在AH诊所提供的儿科医疗保健费用低于急诊科。当比较相似诊断时,我们发现急诊科的费用明显更高。应鼓励患者在适当的时候前往AH诊所进行紧急护理需求,这可以为医疗保健系统节省大量成本。

相似文献

1
After-hours pediatric care compared with emergency department care: a retrospective charge analysis.非工作时间儿科护理与急诊科护理的比较:一项回顾性费用分析。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Apr;54(4):324-7. doi: 10.1177/0009922815574678.
2
Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department.眼科日间手术与急诊就诊的成本和就诊时间比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 1;137(7):729-735. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0864.
3
Comparison of emergency care delivered to children and young adults with complex chronic conditions between pediatric and general emergency departments.儿科和综合急诊科为患有复杂慢性病的儿童和青年提供的急救护理比较。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;21(7):778-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12412. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
4
A new after-hours clinic model provides cost-saving, faster care compared with a pediatric emergency department.与儿科急诊科相比,一种新的非工作时间诊所模式能节省成本且提供更快的护理。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Nov;28(11):1162-5. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318271733e.
5
Evaluating the length of stay and value of time in a pediatric emergency department with two models by comparing two different albuterol delivery systems.评估两种不同沙丁胺醇给药系统的儿科急诊留观时间和时间价值的两种模型。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):704-11. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.674587. Epub 2012 Mar 23.
6
Annual report on health care for children and youth in the United States: focus on injury-related emergency department utilization and expenditures.美国儿童和青少年医疗保健年度报告:关注与伤害相关的急诊科就诊情况及支出
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):219-240.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2008.03.032. Epub 2008 May 27.
7
The value of urgent care dermatology.急诊所带来的价值。
Int J Dermatol. 2019 Jan;58(1):80-85. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14186. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
8
Decreasing Low Acuity Pediatric Emergency Room Visits with Increased Clinic Access and Improved Parent Education.通过增加诊所就诊机会和加强家长教育来减少低危儿科急诊就诊。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):550-557. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.170474.
9
The impact of age and gender on resource utilization and profitability in ED patients seen and released.年龄和性别对急诊就诊后出院患者资源利用及盈利能力的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.06.030. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
10
Effect of trainees on length of stay in the pediatric emergency department.受训者对儿科急诊停留时间的影响。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;16(9):859-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00480.x. Epub 2009 Aug 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Preschool children in Danish out-of-hours primary care: a one-year descriptive study of face-to-face consultations.丹麦课余时间小学保健所的学龄前儿童:面对面咨询的为期一年描述性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Feb 26;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0922-y.