Bork Konrad, Craig Timothy J, Bernstein Jonathan A, Feuersenger Henrike, Machnig Thomas, Staubach Petra
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015 May-Jun;36(3):218-24. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3844. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
Although treatment with C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH) concentrate is well established for hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in general, data that assess its efficacy for cutaneous attack treatment are sparse.
To assess efficacy of plasma-derived, nanofiltered C1-INH concentrate for cutaneous attack treatment by comparing treated attacks from the uncontrolled I.M.P.A.C.T.2 study with historical data for untreated attacks.
Cutaneous attack data from patients with HAE who were treated for cutaneous edema with 20 IU/kg body weight C1-INH concentrate in the uncontrolled I.M.P.A.C.T.2 study (38 patients) were compared with data from untreated patients from an historical data base (46 patients) and included subset analyses for facial edema (treated group, 21 patients; untreated group, 33 patients) and peripheral edema (30 patients in each group). Average attack duration (AAD) per patient was the efficacy end point used to compare treated and untreated patients. Differences were assessed with a Wilcoxon test (primary analysis) and a log-rank test; AAD per patient was analyzed descriptively and graphically with Kaplan-Meier curves.
The AAD per patient of all cutaneous attacks or facial and peripheral cutaneous attack subsets was significantly faster with C1-INH treatment than without treatment (Wilcoxon and log-rank tests, both p < 0.0001 for all comparisons). Mean AADs per patient for all, facial, and peripheral attacks were 2.04, 1.45, and 2.16 days, respectively, in the C1-INH-treated group, and were 3.74, 4.45, and 2.98 days, respectively, in the untreated group. Kaplan-Meier curves corroborated the observed group differences.
Treatment of cutaneous HAE attacks (all attacks or facial and peripheral attack subsets) with 20 IU/kg C1-INH concentrate provided faster attack resolution compared with no treatment.
尽管一般而言,使用C1酯酶抑制剂(C1-INH)浓缩物治疗遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)发作已得到充分确立,但评估其对皮肤发作治疗效果的数据却很少。
通过将非对照的I.M.P.A.C.T.2研究中接受治疗的发作与未治疗发作的历史数据进行比较,评估血浆来源的、经过纳米过滤的C1-INH浓缩物对皮肤发作治疗的效果。
将非对照的I.M.P.A.C.T.2研究中使用20 IU/kg体重的C1-INH浓缩物治疗皮肤水肿的HAE患者的皮肤发作数据(38例患者)与历史数据库中未治疗患者的数据(46例患者)进行比较,并包括面部水肿的亚组分析(治疗组21例患者;未治疗组33例患者)和外周水肿(每组30例患者)。每位患者的平均发作持续时间(AAD)是用于比较治疗组和未治疗组患者的疗效终点。差异采用Wilcoxon检验(主要分析)和对数秩检验进行评估;每位患者的AAD通过Kaplan-Meier曲线进行描述性和图形分析。
与未治疗相比,C1-INH治疗所有皮肤发作或面部及外周皮肤发作亚组的每位患者AAD明显更快(Wilcoxon检验和对数秩检验,所有比较p均<0.0001)。C1-INH治疗组中,所有、面部和外周发作的每位患者平均AAD分别为2.04、1.45和2.16天,未治疗组分别为3.74、4.45和2.98天。Kaplan-Meier曲线证实了观察到的组间差异。
与未治疗相比,使用20 IU/kg C1-INH浓缩物治疗皮肤HAE发作(所有发作或面部及外周发作亚组)能使发作更快缓解。