Suppr超能文献

与使用合成胶体相比,有限的院前血浆复苏是否更有益?一项针对实质性出血家兔的实验研究。

Is limited prehospital resuscitation with plasma more beneficial than using a synthetic colloid? An experimental study in rabbits with parenchymal bleeding.

作者信息

Kheirabadi Bijan S, Valdez-Delgado Krystal K, Terrazas Irasema B, Miranda Nahir, Dubick Michael A

机构信息

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Texas.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Apr;78(4):752-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000591.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reports of survival benefits of early transfusion of plasma with red blood cells (1:1 ratio) in trauma patients suggest that plasma may be a better fluid to replace Hextend for battlefield resuscitation. We studied possible advantages of prehospital resuscitation with plasma compared with Hextend or albumin in a model of uncontrolled hemorrhage.

METHODS

Male New Zealand white rabbits (3.3 ± 0.1 kg) were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to a splenic injury with uncontrolled bleeding. Ten minutes after injury (mean arterial pressure [MAP] < 40 mm Hg), the rabbits received small and equal volumes (15 mL/kg) of rabbit plasma (n = 10), Hextend (n = 10), or 5% human albumin (n = 9) or no fluid. Fluids were administered in two bolus injections (20 minutes apart) and targeted to a MAP of 65 mm Hg. Animals were monitored for 2.5 hours or until death, and their blood losses were measured. Arterial blood samples were collected at different times and analyzed for ABG, CBC, and coagulation tests.

RESULTS

There were no differences in baseline measures among groups. Splenic injury caused similar hemorrhages (9.1 ± 0.4 mL/kg at 10 minutes) and decreased MAP in all subjects. Subsequent resuscitation initiated additional bleeding. At 60 minutes after injury (20 minutes after resuscitation), longer activated partial thromboplastin time and lower fibrinogen concentrations were apparent compared with baseline values with differences among groups. Thrombelastography analysis indicated faster and stronger clot formation with plasma and albumin resuscitation than with Hextend use. Shock indices were increased in all groups, but smaller changes were measured in the albumin group. Total blood loss did not differ among resuscitated rabbits but was higher (p < 0.05) than among nonresuscitated animals. Survival rates were 11% (untreated), 40% (Hextend and plasma), and 89% (albumin, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Resuscitation with plasma or albumin better preserved coagulation function than did Hextend. However, despite these improvements, plasma resuscitation did not reduce blood loss or improve survival, while albumin administration seemed beneficial.

摘要

背景

有关创伤患者早期输注血浆与红细胞(比例为1:1)可带来生存获益的报道表明,在战场复苏中,血浆可能是比贺斯(Hextend)更好的液体替代物。我们在非控制性出血模型中研究了与贺斯或白蛋白相比,院前血浆复苏的潜在优势。

方法

雄性新西兰白兔(体重3.3±0.1千克)麻醉后进行仪器植入,并造成脾脏损伤伴非控制性出血。受伤10分钟后(平均动脉压[MAP]<40毫米汞柱),兔子接受小剂量且等量(15毫升/千克)的兔血浆(n=10)、贺斯(n=10)、5%人白蛋白(n=9)或不输注任何液体。分两次推注给药(间隔20分钟),目标是使MAP达到65毫米汞柱。对动物监测2.5小时或直至死亡,并测量其失血量。在不同时间采集动脉血样本,进行动脉血气分析(ABG)、全血细胞计数(CBC)和凝血试验分析。

结果

各组间基线指标无差异。脾脏损伤导致所有受试动物出现相似的失血量(10分钟时为9.1±0.4毫升/千克)和MAP下降。随后的复苏引发了更多出血。与基线值相比,受伤60分钟后(复苏后20分钟),活化部分凝血活酶时间延长,纤维蛋白原浓度降低,且各组间存在差异。血栓弹力图分析表明,与使用贺斯相比,血浆和白蛋白复苏形成的凝块更快更强。所有组的休克指数均升高,但白蛋白组的变化较小。复苏后的兔子总失血量无差异,但高于未复苏动物(p<0.05)。生存率分别为11%(未治疗组)、40%(贺斯和血浆组)和89%(白蛋白组,p<0.05)。

结论

与贺斯相比,血浆或白蛋白复苏能更好地保留凝血功能。然而,尽管有这些改善,血浆复苏并未减少失血量或提高生存率,而白蛋白给药似乎有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验