Suppr超能文献

糖尿病肾病患者的动态动脉僵硬度指数及相关因素

[Ambulatory arterial stiffness index and associated factors in patients with diabetic kidney disease].

作者信息

Chen Li-jia, Wu Min, Feng Yan-huan, Huang You-qun, Zang Li, Fu Ping, Liu Fang

出版信息

Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Jan;46(1):57-61.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare arterial stiffness between diabetic kidney disease and non-diabetic kidney diseaseand to identify factors predicting ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI).

METHODS

Forty-four patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD group) and thirty-one patients with non-diabetic kidney disease (NDKD group) were recruited for this study. All of the participants had hypertension. The AASI (indirect reflex global arterial stiffness)and short-term blood pressure variability (BPV) were measured using a 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, and compared.between DKD and NDKD groups using analyses of covariance, correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression model.

RESULTS

DKD patients had significantly higher levels of AASI than NDKD patients (0.55 +/- 0.14 vs. 0.45 +/- 0.16, P < 0.05). The 24-h systolic and daytime systolic BP variability of DKD patients was also higher than NDKD patients. In DKD patients, the correlation analysis revealed that the AASI showed association with 24-h systolic BP variability (24 hSBPV), 24-h diastolic BP variability (24 hDBPV),daytime diastolic BP variability (dDBPV), nighttime systolic BP variability (nSBPV) and nighttime diastolic BP variability (nDBPV), and nDBPV and age showed strong associations with AASI.

CONCLUSION

Although both DKD and NDKD patients suffered from arterial stiffness, greater AASI and short-term BPV was detected in DKD patients. AASI is associated with nDBPV and age. Optimal short-term BPV control in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with overt nephropathy may improve arterial elasticity.

摘要

目的

比较糖尿病肾病与非糖尿病肾病患者的动脉僵硬度,并确定预测动态动脉僵硬度指数(AASI)的因素。

方法

本研究招募了44例糖尿病肾病患者(DKD组)和31例非糖尿病肾病患者(NDKD组)。所有参与者均患有高血压。使用24小时动态血压监测仪测量AASI(间接反映整体动脉僵硬度)和短期血压变异性(BPV),并通过协方差分析、相关性分析和多元线性回归模型对DKD组和NDKD组进行比较。

结果

DKD患者的AASI水平显著高于NDKD患者(0.55±0.14 vs. 0.45±0.16,P<0.05)。DKD患者的24小时收缩压和日间收缩压变异性也高于NDKD患者。在DKD患者中,相关性分析显示AASI与24小时收缩压变异性(24 hSBPV)、24小时舒张压变异性(24 hDBPV)、日间舒张压变异性(dDBPV)、夜间收缩压变异性(nSBPV)和夜间舒张压变异性(nDBPV)相关,且nDBPV和年龄与AASI有很强的相关性。

结论

尽管DKD和NDKD患者均存在动脉僵硬度,但DKD患者的AASI和短期BPV更高。AASI与nDBPV和年龄相关。对伴有显性肾病的2型糖尿病高血压患者进行最佳短期BPV控制可能会改善动脉弹性。

相似文献

4
Symmetric ambulatory arterial stiffness index in the young.年轻人的对称动态动脉僵硬度指数
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Jun;10(6):500-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.03.185. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Increased ambulatory arterial stiffness index in obese children.肥胖儿童的动态动脉僵硬度指数升高。
Atherosclerosis. 2015 Feb;238(2):185-9. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验