Velloso Isabela S C, Ceci Christine
School of Nursing, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nurs Philos. 2015 Jul;16(3):153-60. doi: 10.1111/nup.12087. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
Developments in professional practice can be related to ongoing changes in relations of power among professionals, which often lead to changes in the boundaries of practices. The differing contexts of practices also influence these changing relations among health professionals. Legislation governing professional practice also differs from country to country. In Brazil, over the past 12 years, in a climate of deep disagreement, a new law to regulate medical practice has been discussed. It was sanctioned, or made into law, but with some notable changes, in July 2013. Of interest to us in this paper are the ways the proposed legislation, by setting out the boundaries and scope of medical practice, 'interfered' in the practices of other health professions, undermining many 'independent' practices that have developed over time. However, even taking into account the multiple routes through which practices are established and developed, the role of legislation that seems able to contradict and deny the historical realities of multiple, intersecting practices should be critically interrogated. In this paper, we use the theoretical resources of poststructuralist thinking to explore gaps, ambiguities, and power relations implicit in the discourses that constituted this law. We argue that although the new law can be understood as a social and political device that will interfere in the organization of other health professions' practices, such legislation is only part of what constitutes change in a consolidated professional practice. And while it is important to understand the effects of such legislation, healthcare practices are also realized or 'made real' through ongoing relations of knowledge and power, including, as we will see in this case, activities of resistance. The problem, then, is to understand the practical arrangements, including legislation, traditions and routines, values and knowledge that come to shape the practices of nursing in a particular context.
专业实践的发展可能与专业人员之间权力关系的持续变化相关,这往往会导致实践边界的变化。不同的实践背景也会影响卫生专业人员之间这些不断变化的关系。各国规范专业实践的立法也各不相同。在巴西,在过去12年里,在存在深刻分歧的氛围中,一项规范医疗实践的新法律一直在讨论之中。该法律于2013年7月获得批准或成为法律,但有一些显著变化。本文中我们感兴趣的是,拟议的立法通过规定医疗实践的边界和范围,如何“干涉”其他卫生专业的实践,破坏了许多随着时间推移而发展起来的“独立”实践。然而,即使考虑到实践确立和发展的多种途径,对于似乎能够与多种相互交织的实践的历史现实相矛盾和否认的立法作用,也应进行批判性审视。在本文中,我们利用后结构主义思想的理论资源,来探索构成该法律的话语中隐含的差距、模糊性和权力关系。我们认为,虽然新法律可以被理解为一种社会和政治手段,将干涉其他卫生专业实践的组织,但这样的立法只是巩固的专业实践中构成变化的一部分。虽然理解此类立法的影响很重要,但医疗保健实践也是通过持续的知识和权力关系得以实现或“成为现实”的,正如我们在这个案例中将会看到的,包括抵抗活动。那么,问题在于理解在特定背景下塑造护理实践的实际安排,包括立法、传统和惯例、价值观和知识。