• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗时的血小板高反应性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.

Inserm U744, Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):931-42. doi: 10.1111/jth.12907. Epub 2015 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1111/jth.12907
PMID:25809392
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ticagrelor and prasugrel have shown superiority over clopidogrel. However, it remains unclear if one is superior to another regarding on-treatment platelet reactivity.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the impact of ticagrelor and prasugrel on high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR).

METHODS

The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for eligible studies in December 2014. Studies were eligible if they compared ticagrelor and prasugrel regarding high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR). Pooled estimates were calculated by using a random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We included 14 studies and 1822 patients: 805 and 1017 in the ticagrelor and prasugrel groups, respectively. The rate of HTPR was significantly lower in the ticagrelor group: 1.5% vs. 9.8% (RR = 0.27 [0.14-0.50]). The pre-specified analysis focusing on randomized trials (n = 10) showed consistent results (RR = 0.27 [0.12-0.60]).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that ticagrelor allows a higher platelet reactivity inhibition as compared with prasugrel and leads to a further decrease in the rate of HTPR.

摘要

背景

替格瑞洛和普拉格雷均优于氯吡格雷。然而,在治疗中的血小板反应性方面,哪种药物更具优势仍不明确。

目的

比较替格瑞洛和普拉格雷对高反应性血小板治疗(HTPR)的影响。

方法

检索 2014 年 12 月 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库中关于替格瑞洛和普拉格雷比较的相关研究。符合纳入标准的研究为对比替格瑞洛和普拉格雷治疗 HTPR 的研究。采用随机效应模型计算合并估计值,置信区间为 95%。

结果

共纳入 14 项研究,共 1822 例患者:替格瑞洛组 805 例,普拉格雷组 1017 例。替格瑞洛组 HTPR 发生率显著降低:1.5%比 9.8%(RR=0.27[0.14-0.50])。关注随机试验的预设分析(n=10)显示了一致的结果(RR=0.27[0.12-0.60])。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,与普拉格雷相比,替格瑞洛可更好地抑制血小板反应性,进而进一步降低 HTPR 发生率。

相似文献

1
High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ticagrelor versus prasugrel: a systematic review and meta-analysis.替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗时的血小板高反应性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):931-42. doi: 10.1111/jth.12907. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
2
Head to head comparison of Prasugrel versus Ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.普拉格雷与替格瑞洛在急性冠脉综合征患者中的头对头比较:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Dec 12;18(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40360-017-0189-7.
3
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.普拉格雷(Efient®)联合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性冠状动脉综合征(TA182综述):系统评价与经济学分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290.
4
Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity.替格瑞洛和普拉格雷对血小板反应性影响的直接和间接比较的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):716-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.029. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, and Standard-Dose and High-Dose Clopidogrel in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Network Meta-analysis.普拉格雷、替格瑞洛以及标准剂量和高剂量氯吡格雷在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中的疗效与安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Am J Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;23(1):e52-62. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000350.
6
Impact of clopidogrel and potent P2Y 12 -inhibitors on mortality and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.氯吡格雷和强效 P2Y12 抑制剂对急性冠脉综合征或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的死亡率和卒中的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109(1):93-101. doi: 10.1160/TH12-06-0377. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
7
Comparing newer oral anti-platelets prasugrel and ticagrelor in reduction of ischemic events-evidence from a network meta-analysis.比较新型口服抗血小板药物普拉格雷和替格瑞洛在减少缺血事件方面的疗效——来自网状荟萃分析的证据。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2013 Oct;36(3):223-32. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0838-z.
8
Effects of clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor on prevention of stent thrombosis in patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis.氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者预防支架血栓形成的影响:网状荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Apr;44(4):488-494. doi: 10.1002/clc.23536. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
9
Comparative effects of different antiplatelet strategies in carriers of CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles: a network meta-analysis.携带 CYP2C19 失活等位基因的患者中不同抗血小板策略的比较效果:网状荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Oct 4;10(6):526-536. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae036.
10
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.比较急性冠状动脉综合征患者中普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的血小板反应性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01603-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Clopidogrel resistance and its relevance: Current concepts.氯吡格雷抵抗及其相关性:当前概念
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jun;13(6):2187-2199. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1473_23. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Platelet-derived circFAM13B associated with anti-platelet responsiveness of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome.血小板衍生的环状FAM13B与急性冠脉综合征患者替格瑞洛的抗血小板反应性相关。
Thromb J. 2024 Jun 21;22(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12959-024-00620-9.
3
Resistance on the Latest Oral and Intravenous P2Y12 ADP Receptor Blockers in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Fact or Myth?
急性冠状动脉综合征患者对最新口服和静脉用P2Y12 ADP受体阻滞剂的耐药性:事实还是误解?
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 4;11(23):7211. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237211.
4
CIRSE Standards of Practice on Below-the-Knee Revascularisation.经皮腔内血管成形术治疗膝下血管病变的 CIRSE 实践标准
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Sep;44(9):1309-1322. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02891-5. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
5
Safety and feasibility of low-dose ticagrelor in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.低剂量替格瑞洛在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的安全性和可行性。
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Jan;44(1):123-128. doi: 10.1002/clc.23517. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
6
Comparison of platelet reactivity between prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.比较急性冠状动脉综合征患者中普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的血小板反应性:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Oct 1;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01603-0.
7
Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Genotypes: Results of a Randomized Pharmacodynamic Study in a Feasibility Investigation of Rapid Genetic Testing.携带CYP2C19功能缺失基因型患者中普拉格雷与替格瑞洛的比较:快速基因检测可行性研究中的一项随机药效学研究结果
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020 Mar 25;5(5):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.02.009. eCollection 2020 May.
8
Platelet Function Test Use for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease in the Early 2020s.2020年代初冠状动脉疾病患者的血小板功能检测应用
J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 10;9(1):194. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010194.
9
Stratified Approaches to Antiplatelet Therapies Based on Platelet Reactivity Testing.基于血小板反应性检测的抗血小板治疗分层方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Dec 3;6:176. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00176. eCollection 2019.
10
Gender-based differences in platelet function and platelet reactivity to P2Y12 inhibitors.性别对血小板功能和对 P2Y12 抑制剂的血小板反应性的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 27;14(11):e0225771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225771. eCollection 2019.