The Heart Research Center of Chonnam National University Hospital Designated by Korea Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Gwangju, Korea.
Korean Circ J. 2015 Mar;45(2):110-6. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2015.45.2.110. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
We sought to evaluate the effect of the early use of ezetimibe/simvastatin (Vytorin®) on arterial healing and endothelialization after the implantation of a drug-eluting stent (DES) in a porcine model of coronary restenosis.
A total of 20 pigs (40 coronary arteries) were randomly allocated to a pretreatment or no treatment group. The pretreatment group (n=20) received oral ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/20 mg) daily for 7 days before stenting and the no pretreatment group (n=20) did not. All pigs were treated with ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/20 mg) daily after stenting for 4 weeks. Stenting was performed using a bare-metal stent (BMS, n=10) and three types of DES: biolimus A9-eluting stent (BES, n=10), zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES, n=10), and everolimus-eluting stents (EES, n=10). Four weeks later, pigs underwent a follow-up coronary angiography and were sacrificed for histopathologic analysis.
There were no significant differences between the pretreatment and no pretreatment groups in the internal elastic lamina area, lumen area, neointima area, stenotic area, injury score, fibrin score, and inflammation score. In both groups, the fibrin score was higher in pigs with DES than in BMS, particularly in ZES and EES. The inflammatory score was not different between DES and BMS.
In a porcine model of coronary restenosis, pretreatment with ezetimibe/simvastatin before DES implantation failed to improve arterial healing and endothelialization compared to treatment after stenting.
我们旨在评估在猪冠状动脉再狭窄模型中,早期使用依折麦布/辛伐他汀(Vytorin®)对药物洗脱支架(DES)植入后动脉愈合和内皮化的影响。
总共 20 头猪(40 条冠状动脉)被随机分配到预处理组或无预处理组。预处理组(n=20)在支架置入前每天口服依折麦布/辛伐他汀(10/20mg),共 7 天,而无预处理组(n=20)则不进行预处理。所有猪在支架置入后每天给予依折麦布/辛伐他汀(10/20mg),共 4 周。支架置入采用裸金属支架(BMS,n=10)和三种类型的 DES:依维莫司 A9 洗脱支架(BES,n=10)、佐他莫司洗脱支架(ZES,n=10)和依维莫司洗脱支架(EES,n=10)。4 周后,猪接受了随访冠状动脉造影,并进行了组织病理学分析。
预处理组和无预处理组之间,内弹力膜面积、管腔面积、新生内膜面积、狭窄面积、损伤评分、纤维蛋白评分和炎症评分均无显著差异。在两组中,DES 组的纤维蛋白评分均高于 BMS 组,尤其是 ZES 和 EES 组。DES 和 BMS 组之间的炎症评分无差异。
在猪冠状动脉再狭窄模型中,与支架置入后治疗相比,DES 置入前用依折麦布/辛伐他汀预处理并不能改善动脉愈合和内皮化。