Suppr超能文献

小儿创伤中的二次过度分诊:能否避免不必要的患者转运?

Secondary overtriage in pediatric trauma: can unnecessary patient transfers be avoided?

作者信息

Goldstein Seth D, Van Arendonk Kyle, Aboagye Jonathan K, Salazar Jose H, Michailidou Maria, Ziegfeld Susan, Lukish Jeffrey, Stewart F Dylan, Haut Elliott R, Abdullah Fizan

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jun;50(6):1028-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.03.028. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In an era of wide regionalization of pediatric trauma systems, interhospital patient transfer is common. Decisions regarding the location of definitive trauma care depend on prehospital destination criteria (primary triage) and interfacility transfers (secondary triage). Secondary overtriage can occur in any resource-limited setting but is not well characterized in pediatric trauma.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank from 2008 to 2011 was queried to identify patients 15 years or younger who were transferred to pediatric trauma centers. Secondary overtriage was defined as meeting all 4 of the following criteria: injury severity score (ISS) less than 9, no need for surgical procedure, no critical care admission, and length of stay of less than 24 hours. All other transfers were deemed appropriate triage.

RESULTS

Our definition of secondary overtriage was met in 32,318 patients out of 144,420 transfers (22.4%). Within this group, 37.5% were discharged directly from the emergency department of the receiving hospital without hospital admission. Appropriately triaged patients required a therapeutic procedure in 43.5% of cases. Differences in age, sex, mechanism of injury, and payer status were modest.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary overtriage is prevalent in pediatric trauma systems nationwide and is not associated with any particular patient characteristics. Because clinical outcomes and healthcare spending are increasingly scrutinized, secondary overtriage may reflect unnecessary patient transfer and a source of potential cost savings. Development of better guidelines for secondary triage of pediatric trauma patients may enable timely assessment and treatment of children who require a higher level of care while also preventing inefficient use of available resources.

摘要

背景

在儿科创伤系统广泛区域化的时代,医院间的患者转运很常见。关于确定性创伤治疗地点的决策取决于院前目的地标准(初级分诊)和机构间转运(次级分诊)。次级过度分诊可能发生在任何资源有限的环境中,但在儿科创伤中尚未得到充分描述。

方法

查询2008年至2011年的国家创伤数据库,以识别15岁及以下被转运至儿科创伤中心的患者。次级过度分诊被定义为符合以下所有4项标准:损伤严重度评分(ISS)小于9、无需手术、无需重症监护病房收治且住院时间少于24小时。所有其他转运被视为适当分诊。

结果

在144,420例转运患者中,有32,318例(22.4%)符合我们对次级过度分诊的定义。在这组患者中,37.5%直接从接收医院的急诊科出院,未住院。适当分诊的患者在43.5%的病例中需要进行治疗性操作。年龄、性别、损伤机制和支付者状态的差异不大。

结论

次级过度分诊在全国范围内的儿科创伤系统中普遍存在,且与任何特定的患者特征无关。由于临床结果和医疗保健支出受到越来越多的审查,次级过度分诊可能反映了不必要的患者转运以及潜在的成本节约来源。制定更好的儿科创伤患者次级分诊指南可能有助于及时评估和治疗需要更高水平护理的儿童,同时也能防止现有资源的低效使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验