• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜切除术前分化型胃肿瘤中未分化组织学的内镜预测指标

Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.

作者信息

Choi Ji Min, Kim Sang Gyun, Yang Hyo-Joon, Lim Joo Hyun, Choi Jeongmin, Im Jong Pil, Kim Joo Sung, Kim Woo Ho, Jung Hyun Chae

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Daehangno 101, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, South Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4165-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4165-2
PMID:25814072
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is often a discrepancy between results from endoscopic forceps biopsy and resected specimen. We aimed to identify endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.

METHODS

Medical records of the patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for biopsy-proven differentiated gastric neoplasms at Seoul National University Hospital between July 2005 and July 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The lesions were divided into two groups based on the final histologic result of ESD: differentiated adenocarcinoma (DA group) and undifferentiated histology (UDH group). The discordant rate, clinicopathologic characteristics, and endoscopic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1641 early gastric cancers from 1615 patients were included. Of these, 1556 (94.8%) were diagnosed as DA and 85 (5.2%) as UDH. The mean age was significantly lower, and number of women was higher in the UDH group than in the DA group. On multivariate analysis, age <65 years [odds ratio (OR) 1.75, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.80], female sex (OR 3.19, 95% CI 2.00-5.08), endoscopic size >10 mm (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.12-2.92), depressed type (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.56-5.21), nodularity (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.59-5.05), and whitish discoloration (OR 19.64, 95% CI 6.98-55.25) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Female sex, age <65 years, large endoscopic size, depressed morphology, surface nodularity, and whitish discoloration were predictors for UDH. Meticulous attention should be paid to the lesions with these endoscopic predictors for determining the risk of UDH prior to endoscopic resection.

摘要

背景

内镜钳取活检结果与切除标本结果之间常常存在差异。我们旨在确定内镜切除术前分化型胃肿瘤中未分化组织学的内镜预测因素。

方法

回顾性分析2005年7月至2014年7月在首尔国立大学医院接受内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗活检证实为分化型胃肿瘤患者的病历。根据ESD的最终组织学结果将病变分为两组:分化型腺癌(DA组)和未分化组织学(UDH组)。分析不一致率、临床病理特征和内镜因素。

结果

共纳入1615例患者的1641例早期胃癌。其中,1556例(94.8%)诊断为DA,85例(5.2%)诊断为UDH。UDH组的平均年龄显著低于DA组,女性患者数量高于DA组。多因素分析显示,年龄<65岁[比值比(OR)1.75,95%置信区间(CI)1.10 - 2.80]、女性(OR 3.19,95% CI 2.00 - 5.08)、内镜下大小>10 mm(OR 1.81,95% CI 1.12 - 2.92)、凹陷型(OR 2.85,95% CI 1.56 - 5.21)、结节状(OR 2.83,95% CI 1.59 - 5.05)和白色变色(OR 19.64,95% CI 6.98 - 55.25)是独立的预测因素。

结论

女性、年龄<65岁、内镜下较大尺寸、凹陷形态、表面结节状和白色变色是UDH的预测因素。在内镜切除术前,对于具有这些内镜预测因素的病变,应格外关注以确定UDH的风险。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic predictors for undifferentiated histology in differentiated gastric neoplasms prior to endoscopic resection.内镜切除术前分化型胃肿瘤中未分化组织学的内镜预测指标
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):89-98. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4165-2. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
2
Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.内镜切除早期胃癌后分化型和未分化型组织学差异的临床病理因素和结局。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2097-105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3441-x. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
3
Histologic diagnosis based on forceps biopsy is not adequate for determining endoscopic treatment of gastric adenomatous lesions.基于活检钳的组织学诊断不足以确定胃腺瘤性病变的内镜治疗。
Endoscopy. 2010 Aug;42(8):620-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255524. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
4
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for undifferentiated early gastric cancer.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗未分化型早期胃癌的临床疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Mar;24(3):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0614-0. Epub 2009 Jul 8.
5
Predictive factors to diagnosis undifferentiated early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜下黏膜下剥离术后诊断未分化早期胃癌的预测因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(36):e8044. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008044.
6
Pathologic discordance of differentiation between endoscopic biopsy and postoperative specimen in mucosal gastric adenocarcinomas.胃黏膜腺癌内镜活检与术后标本分化程度的病理差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Dec;20(13):4231-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3196-y.
7
A scoring system for patients with a tumor-positive lateral resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.早期胃癌内镜切除术后肿瘤阳性侧切缘患者的评分系统。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2751-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4543-9. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
The superficial elevated and depressed lesion type is an independent factor associated with non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer.浅表隆起及凹陷型病变是早期胃癌内镜下黏膜下剥离术非治愈性切除的独立相关因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4880-4888. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4825-x. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
9
Mixed-histologic-type submucosal invasive gastric cancer as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis: feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection.混合型组织学类型的黏膜下浸润性胃癌作为淋巴结转移的危险因素:内镜黏膜下剥离术的可行性
Endoscopy. 2009 May;41(5):427-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1214495. Epub 2009 May 5.
10
The long-term outcome and risk factors of histologic discrepancy between forceps biopsies and endoscopic resections in early gastric cancer: An observational study.早期胃癌内镜切除与活检组织学差异的长期结果和危险因素:一项观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 7;103(23):e38451. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038451.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic factors for ESD of early gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术的预后因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Sep;8(9):E1144-E1155. doi: 10.1055/a-1201-3089. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Histologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens of colorectal polyp in actual clinical practice.实际临床实践中大肠息肉内镜活检钳活检与内镜黏膜切除术标本的组织学差异。
Intest Res. 2018 Jul;16(3):475-483. doi: 10.5217/ir.2018.16.3.475. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
3
Preoperative predictors of beyond endoscopic submucosal dissection indication or lymphovascular invasion in endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinicopathologic factors and outcomes of histologic discrepancy between differentiated and undifferentiated types after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.内镜切除早期胃癌后分化型和未分化型组织学差异的临床病理因素和结局。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jul;28(7):2097-105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3441-x. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
2
The risk factors for discrepancy after endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric category 3 lesion (low grade dysplasia).内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗胃 3 类病变(低级别上皮内瘤变)后出现差异的危险因素。
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Feb;59(2):421-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-013-2874-8. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
3
Discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and endoscopic resection in gastric epithelial neoplasia.
内镜下黏膜剥离术适应证或早期胃癌内镜切除术后淋巴管浸润的术前预测因素。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2948-2957. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-6009-8. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
4
Predictive factors to diagnosis undifferentiated early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection.内镜下黏膜下剥离术后诊断未分化早期胃癌的预测因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(36):e8044. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008044.
5
Does the discrepancy in histologic differentiation between a forceps biopsy and an endoscopic specimen necessitate additional surgery in early gastric cancer?钳取活检与内镜标本在组织学分化上的差异是否使得早期胃癌患者需要接受额外手术?
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017 Aug 15;9(8):319-326. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v9.i8.319.
6
The Characteristics and Prognosis of Diffuse-Type Early Gastric Cancer Diagnosed during Health Check-Ups.健康体检诊断的弥漫型早期胃癌的特征与预后。
Gut Liver. 2017 Nov 15;11(6):807-812. doi: 10.5009/gnl17033.
7
Clinical implications of pre-existing adenoma in endoscopically resected early gastric cancers.内镜切除的早期胃癌中既往存在腺瘤的临床意义。
PLoS One. 2017 May 25;12(5):e0178419. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178419. eCollection 2017.
8
How to Interpret the Pathological Report before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Early Gastric Cancer.早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术前后病理报告的解读方法
Clin Endosc. 2016 Jul;49(4):327-31. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.082. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
内镜活检钳与内镜切除术在胃上皮肿瘤中的差异。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Apr;28(4):1256-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3316-6. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
Tissue acquisition in gastric epithelial tumor prior to endoscopic resection.内镜切除术前胃上皮肿瘤的组织获取
Clin Endosc. 2013 Sep;46(5):436-40. doi: 10.5946/ce.2013.46.5.436. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
5
Eradication of Helicobacter pylori after endoscopic resection of gastric tumors does not reduce incidence of metachronous gastric carcinoma.内镜切除胃肿瘤后清除幽门螺杆菌不能降低胃癌的发生率。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 May;12(5):793-800.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.057. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
6
Clinical implication of endoscopic gross appearance in early gastric cancer: revisited.内镜大体形态在早期胃癌中的临床意义:再探。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct;27(10):3690-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2947-y. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
7
Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the stomach.胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征和预后。
Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):43-53. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0234-1. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
8
Risk factors of residual or recurrent tumor in patients with a tumor-positive resection margin after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.内镜切除早期胃癌术后切缘阳性患者肿瘤残留或复发的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2013 May;27(5):1561-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2627-3. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
9
Signet ring cell mixed histology may show more aggressive behavior than other histologies in early gastric cancer.胃早癌中,印戒细胞混合组织学类型比其他组织学类型可能表现出更具侵袭性的生物学行为。
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;107(2):124-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.23261. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
10
Discrepancies in histologic diagnoses of early gastric cancer between biopsy and endoscopic mucosal resection specimens.早期胃癌活检和内镜黏膜切除标本组织学诊断的差异。
Gastric Cancer. 2012 Jan;15(1):91-6. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0075-8. Epub 2011 Aug 4.