Charokopou M, McEwan P, Lister S, Callan L, Bergenheim K, Tolley K, Postema R, Townsend R, Roudaut M
Pharmerit International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Monmouth, UK.
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):890-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12772. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor, compared with a sulfonylurea, when added to metformin for treatment of UK people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin alone.
Clinical inputs sourced from a head-to-head randomized controlled trial (RCT) informed the Cardiff diabetes decision model. Risk equations developed from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) were used in conjunction with the clinical inputs to predict disease progression and the incidence of micro- and macrovascular complications over a lifetime horizon. Cost and utility data were generated to present the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for both treatment arms, and sensitivity and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the impact of uncertainty on the final model results.
The dapagliflozin treatment arm was associated with a mean incremental benefit of 0.467 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.420; 0.665], with an incremental cost of £1246 (95% CI: £613; £1637). This resulted in an ICER point estimate of £2671 per QALY gained. Incremental costs were shown to be insensitive to parameter variation, with only treatment-related weight change having a significant impact on the incremental QALYs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis determined that dapagliflozin had a 100% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000 per QALY.
Dapagliflozin in combination with metformin was shown to be a cost-effective treatment option compared with sulfonylurea from a UK healthcare perspective for people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
评估在二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的英国2型糖尿病患者中,与磺脲类药物相比,钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT-2)抑制剂达格列净添加到二甲双胍治疗中的成本效益。
来自一项头对头随机对照试验(RCT)的临床数据输入卡迪夫糖尿病决策模型。结合英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)开发的风险方程与临床数据,预测一生期间的疾病进展以及微血管和大血管并发症的发生率。生成成本和效用数据以呈现两个治疗组的增量成本效益比(ICER),并进行敏感性和情景分析以评估不确定性对最终模型结果的影响。
达格列净治疗组的平均增量获益为0.467个质量调整生命年(QALY)[95%置信区间(CI):0.420;0.665],增量成本为1246英镑(95%CI:613英镑;1637英镑)。这导致每获得一个QALY的ICER点估计值为2671英镑。增量成本对参数变化不敏感,只有与治疗相关的体重变化对增量QALY有显著影响。概率敏感性分析确定,在每QALY支付意愿阈值为20000英镑时,达格列净具有成本效益的概率为100%。
从英国医疗保健角度来看,对于二甲双胍单药治疗血糖控制不佳的2型糖尿病患者,与磺脲类药物相比,达格列净联合二甲双胍是一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。