van de Vlekkert J, Hoogendijk J E, de Visser M
Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rudolf Magnus Institute for Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Neuromuscul Disord. 2015 Jun;25(6):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
The objective of this study was to investigate if patients with endomysial mononuclear cell infiltrates invading non-necrotic fibers have a disease course consistent with inclusion body myositis (IBM), irrespective of other histopathological and clinical characteristics. All patients with a muscle biopsy showing endomysial inflammation with invasion of non-necrotic muscle fibers during the period 1979-2006 in two tertiary neuromuscular referral centers were classified into three groups: 1) patients whose biopsies also showed rimmed vacuoles; 2) patients whose biopsies showed no vacuoles but fulfilled clinical criteria for IBM, and 3) patients whose biopsies showed no vacuoles, and also did not fulfill clinical criteria for IBM (unclassified patients). These groups were compared with regard to age, gender, clinical features, and disease course including response to immunosuppressive treatment. Eighty-one individuals (41 men) were included. Rimmed vacuoles were found in 49 patients (60.5%). Fourteen patients (17.3%) fulfilled clinical criteria for IBM and 18 patients (22.2%) were unclassified at presentation. At follow up (mean duration 9 years) three women remained unclassified (4%). There were no differences in disease course or effect of treatment between the three groups. Men had more often rimmed vacuoles than women (73% vs 48%; p = 0.018), and women more often than men were unclassified. Women tended to show more often temporary improvement if treated (p = 0.07), but none had sustained improvement. In conclusion, patients with a muscle biopsy showing endomysial cell infiltration with invasion of non-necrotic muscle fibers most probably have IBM, regardless of clinical and other pathological features. Women lack typical features more often than men.
本研究的目的是调查肌内膜单核细胞浸润并侵入非坏死性纤维的患者是否具有与包涵体肌炎(IBM)一致的病程,而不考虑其他组织病理学和临床特征。1979年至2006年期间,在两个三级神经肌肉转诊中心接受肌肉活检显示肌内膜炎症且非坏死性肌纤维受侵的所有患者被分为三组:1)活检还显示有镶边空泡的患者;2)活检未显示空泡但符合IBM临床标准的患者;3)活检未显示空泡且也不符合IBM临床标准的患者(未分类患者)。对这些组在年龄、性别、临床特征以及包括对免疫抑制治疗反应在内病程方面进行比较。共纳入81人(41名男性)。49例患者(60.5%)发现有镶边空泡。14例患者(17.3%)符合IBM临床标准,18例患者(22.2%)在初诊时未分类。随访(平均时长9年)时,3名女性仍未分类(4%)。三组之间在病程或治疗效果方面无差异。男性出现镶边空泡的情况比女性更常见(73%对48%;p = 0.018),女性未分类的情况比男性更常见。女性接受治疗后更常出现暂时改善(p = 0.07),但无人有持续改善。总之,肌肉活检显示肌内膜细胞浸润并侵入非坏死性肌纤维的患者很可能患有IBM,无论临床和其他病理特征如何。女性比男性更常缺乏典型特征。