• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于识别初级保健中身体不适的新问卷:“身体不适症状清单”。

A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The 'BDS checklist'.

作者信息

Budtz-Lilly Anna, Fink Per, Ørnbøl Eva, Vestergaard Mogens, Moth Grete, Christensen Kaj Sparle, Rosendal Marianne

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Research Clinic for Functional Disorders and Psychosomatics, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

J Psychosom Res. 2015 Jun;78(6):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006
PMID:25818346
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS.

METHOD

The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups.

RESULTS

Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of ≥4 symptoms in a symptom group.

CONCLUSION

The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research.

摘要

背景

功能症状和障碍在初级保健中很常见。身体不适综合征(BDS)是一种新提出的功能障碍临床诊断。BDS诊断基于实证研究,BDS标准中所述症状已被转化为一份名为BDS清单的自我报告问卷。本研究的目的是调查该清单的心理测量特性并检验BDS的结构。

方法

在一项关于丹麦普通实践中接触和疾病模式的横断面研究中,2480名成年初级保健患者完成了包含30个条目的BDS清单。我们对收集到的清单数据进行了(内部)验证分析。我们还进行了因子分析和潜在类别分析,以识别BDS症状组和BDS患者组。

结果

内部验证分析显示BDS清单具有可接受且可用的心理测量特性。因子分析确定了BDS的四个不同决定因素:心肺、胃肠道、肌肉骨骼和一般症状。因子分析和多特质分析结果表明BDS清单可缩短(从30项减至25项)。潜在类别分析得出三个严重程度级别(无、中度和重度BDS);在一个症状组中,发现≥4个症状的阈值具有最佳拟合指数。

结论

结果为先前描述的具有四个症状组和三个患者组的BDS结构提供了实证支持。BDS清单是一种自我报告工具,可用于临床实践和研究中的病例发现。

相似文献

1
A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The 'BDS checklist'.一种用于识别初级保健中身体不适的新问卷:“身体不适症状清单”。
J Psychosom Res. 2015 Jun;78(6):536-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
2
Validation of the German version of the Bodily Distress Syndrome 25 checklist in a representative German population sample.验证身体痛苦综合征 25 清单的德语版本在代表性的德国人群样本中的有效性。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 May;132:109991. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109991. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
3
The BDS checklist as measure of illness severity: a cross-sectional cohort study in the Danish general population, primary care and specialised setting.作为疾病严重程度衡量指标的BDS检查表:丹麦普通人群、初级保健和专科环境中的一项横断面队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e042880. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042880.
4
Can the bodily distress syndrome (BDS) concept be used to assess functional somatic symptoms in adolescence?躯体痛苦综合征(BDS)概念可否用于评估青少年的功能性躯体症状?
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Dec;163:111064. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2022.111064. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
5
Validation of the Chinese version bodily distress syndrome checklist in Chinese out-patients of general hospitals.中文版身体不适综合征检查表在综合医院中国门诊患者中的验证
J Psychosom Res. 2022 Feb;153:110702. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110702. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
6
Patient characteristics and frequency of bodily distress syndrome in primary care: a cross-sectional study.基层医疗中患者特征与身体不适综合征的发生率:一项横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2015 Sep;65(638):e617-23. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X686545.
7
Multiple somatic symptoms in primary care patients: a cross-sectional study of consultation content, clinical management strategy and burden of encounter.基层医疗患者的多种躯体症状:一项关于会诊内容、临床管理策略及就诊负担的横断面研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Jul 30;17:100. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0478-z.
8
Application and validation of the bodily distress syndrome checklist in a psychosomatic outpatient sample.躯体痛苦综合征检查表在身心门诊样本中的应用与验证。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;69:104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.12.005. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
9
The unifying diagnostic construct of bodily distress syndrome (BDS) was confirmed in the general population.躯体痛苦综合征(BDS)的统一诊断结构在普通人群中得到了证实。
J Psychosom Res. 2020 Jan;128:109868. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109868. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
The prognosis of bodily distress syndrome: a cohort study in primary care.身体不适综合征的预后:一项初级保健队列研究
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2015 Nov-Dec;37(6):560-6. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding General Somatic Symptom Burden: Insights from a Systematic Review of Factor Analyses Pertaining to the Patient Health Questionnaire 15 (PHQ-15) and Somatic Symptom Scale 8 (SSS-8).理解一般躯体症状负担:对与患者健康问卷15(PHQ - 15)和躯体症状量表8(SSS - 8)相关的因素分析进行系统评价的见解。
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1007/s12529-025-10365-y.
2
Empirical assessment of functional somatic disorder (FSD): frequency, applicability, and diagnostic refinement in a population-based sample.功能性躯体障碍(FSD)的实证评估:基于人群样本的发生率、适用性及诊断细化
BMC Med. 2025 Apr 14;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04042-w.
3
Cohort profile: The BiCoVac cohort - a nationwide Danish cohort to assess short and long-term symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination.
队列简介:BiCoVac队列——一个丹麦全国性队列,用于评估新冠病毒疫苗接种后的短期和长期症状。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;40(2):225-233. doi: 10.1007/s10654-025-01204-1. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
4
Fear of cancer recurrence in long-term colorectal cancer survivors: a nationwide cross-sectional study.长期结直肠癌幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧:一项全国性横断面研究。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jan 27. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01746-z.
5
Infancy predictors of functional somatic symptoms in pre- and late adolescence: a longitudinal cohort study.婴幼儿期对青春期前和青春期后期功能性躯体症状的预测因素:一项纵向队列研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec 2;184(1):57. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05850-7.
6
Fluctuation of functional somatic disorders in a population-based cohort. The DanFunD study.基于人群的功能性躯体障碍波动。DanFunD 研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 16;19(10):e0312031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312031. eCollection 2024.
7
Can internal medicine specialists diagnose functional somatic disorders (FSDs)? Training and comparison with FSD specialists.内科医生能否诊断功能性躯体障碍(FSD)?培训及与 FSD 专家的比较。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 12;19(7):e0307057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307057. eCollection 2024.
8
Exploring the course of functional somatic symptoms (FSS) from pre- to late adolescence and associated internalizing psychopathology - an observational cohort-study.探讨从青春期前到青春期晚期功能性躯体症状(FSS)的发展过程及其与内化性精神病理学的关系——一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 8;24(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05937-3.
9
Revisiting the symptom iceberg based on the Danish symptom cohort - Symptom experiences and healthcare-seeking behaviour in the general Danish population in 2022.基于丹麦症状队列重新审视症状冰山——2022年丹麦普通人群的症状体验与就医行为
Heliyon. 2024 May 13;10(10):e31090. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31090. eCollection 2024 May 30.
10
Missingness mechanisms and generalizability of patient reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer survivors - assessing the reasonableness of the "missing completely at random" assumption.结直肠癌幸存者患者报告结局测量的缺失机制和可推广性 - 评估“完全随机缺失”假设的合理性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 3;24(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02236-z.