Suppr超能文献

在 R-CHOP-14 方案中,用 4 剂非聚乙二醇化的与 1 剂聚乙二醇化的粒细胞集落刺激因子作为支持治疗,用于治疗老年弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者。

Four doses of unpegylated versus one dose of pegylated filgrastim as supportive therapy in R-CHOP-14 for elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

机构信息

Institute of Haematology, Catholic University S. Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2015 Jun;169(6):787-94. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13358. Epub 2015 Mar 29.

Abstract

The primary objective of this prospective, randomized study was to compare the efficacy of a reduced regimen of only four doses of unpegylated filgrastim from day +8 to +11 per cycle with a standard once per cycle administration of pegylated filgrastim to maintain dose-intensity of R-CHOP-14 (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone given every 14 d) in previously untreated elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We included 51 patients (median age 66 years, range 60-76). Median dose intensity did not differ between the group of 24 patients receiving four doses of unpegylated filgrastim of each cycle (87·5%) and the group of 27 patients receiving pegylated filgrastim once per cycle on day 2 (89·4%) (P = 0·9). There was also no difference in the frequency of adverse events, such as episodes of neutropenic fever and unplanned hospitalizations. Patient characteristics that negatively influenced dose intensity were reduced performance status, advanced stage disease and poor-risk International Prognostic Index, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 being the most significant factor. In conclusion, a limited support with 4 d of filgrastim appears to be equivalent to pegylated filgrastim administered once per cycle, and appears to be sufficient to maintain dose-intensity of the R-CHOP-14 regimen in elderly patients with DLBCL without risk factors.

摘要

本前瞻性、随机研究的主要目的是比较在每周期第 8 至 11 天给予 4 剂非聚乙二醇化粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的简化方案与每周期给予 1 剂聚乙二醇化 G-CSF 方案,以维持利妥昔单抗、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱、泼尼松(R-CHOP-14)方案剂量强度在未经治疗的老年弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中的疗效。我们纳入了 51 例患者(中位年龄 66 岁,范围 60-76 岁)。接受每周期 4 剂非聚乙二醇化 G-CSF 治疗的 24 例患者(87.5%)和接受每周期 1 剂聚乙二醇化 G-CSF 治疗的 27 例患者(89.4%)的剂量强度中位数无差异(P=0.9)。中性粒细胞减少性发热和计划外住院等不良事件的发生率也无差异。影响剂量强度的患者特征包括体力状态下降、晚期疾病和不良风险国际预后指数(IPI),东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体力状态≥2 是最重要的因素。总之,4 天的 G-CSF 支持似乎与每周期给予 1 剂聚乙二醇化 G-CSF 等效,并且似乎足以维持无危险因素的老年 DLBCL 患者 R-CHOP-14 方案的剂量强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验