Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Athens 15771, Greece.
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou, Athens 15771, Greece.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Jun 23;86:27-45. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Plasma protein binding (PPB) strongly affects drug distribution and pharmacokinetic behavior with consequences in overall pharmacological action. Extended plasma protein binding may be associated with drug safety issues and several adverse effects, like low clearance, low brain penetration, drug-drug interactions, loss of efficacy, while influencing the fate of enantiomers and diastereoisomers by stereoselective binding within the body. Therefore in holistic drug design approaches, where ADME(T) properties are considered in parallel with target affinity, considerable efforts are focused in early estimation of PPB mainly in regard to human serum albumin (HSA), which is the most abundant and most important plasma protein. The second critical serum protein α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP), although often underscored, plays also an important and complicated role in clinical therapy and thus the last years it has been studied thoroughly too. In the present review, after an overview of the principles of HSA and AGP binding as well as the structure topology of the proteins, the current trends and perspectives in the field of PPB predictions are presented and discussed considering both HSA and AGP binding. Since however for the latter protein systematic studies have started only the last years, the review focuses mainly to HSA. One part of the review highlights the challenge to develop rapid techniques for HSA and AGP binding simulation and their performance in assessment of PPB. The second part focuses on in silico approaches to predict HSA and AGP binding, analyzing and evaluating structure-based and ligand-based methods, as well as combination of both methods in the aim to exploit the different information and overcome the limitations of each individual approach. Ligand-based methods use the Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) methodology to establish quantitate models for the prediction of binding constants from molecular descriptors, while they provide only indirect information on binding mechanism. Efforts for the establishment of global models, automated workflows and web-based platforms for PPB predictions are presented and discussed. Structure-based methods relying on the crystal structures of drug-protein complexes provide detailed information on the underlying mechanism but are usually restricted to specific compounds. They are useful to identify the specific binding site while they may be important in investigating drug-drug interactions, related to PPB. Moreover, chemometrics or structure-based modeling may be supported by experimental data a promising integrated alternative strategy for ADME(T) properties optimization. In the case of PPB the use of molecular modeling combined with bioanalytical techniques is frequently used for the investigation of AGP binding.
血浆蛋白结合(PPB)强烈影响药物分布和药代动力学行为,从而影响整体药理作用。扩展的血浆蛋白结合可能与药物安全性问题和多种不良反应相关,如清除率低、脑穿透性低、药物相互作用、疗效丧失,同时通过体内立体选择性结合影响对映异构体和非对映异构体的命运。因此,在整体药物设计方法中,ADME(T)性质与靶标亲和力并行考虑,人们致力于早期估算 PPB,主要是针对人血清白蛋白(HSA),这是最丰富和最重要的血浆蛋白。第二种关键的血清蛋白α1-酸性糖蛋白(AGP),虽然经常被强调,但在临床治疗中也起着重要而复杂的作用,因此近年来也进行了深入研究。在本综述中,在概述 HSA 和 AGP 结合的原理以及蛋白质的结构拓扑之后,介绍并讨论了当前在 PPB 预测领域的趋势和观点,同时考虑了 HSA 和 AGP 结合。由于后者的系统研究仅在最近几年才开始,因此该综述主要侧重于 HSA。综述的一部分重点介绍了开发用于 HSA 和 AGP 结合模拟的快速技术的挑战及其在评估 PPB 中的性能。第二部分侧重于预测 HSA 和 AGP 结合的计算方法,分析和评估基于结构和基于配体的方法,以及两种方法的结合,以利用不同的信息并克服每种方法的局限性。基于配体的方法使用定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)方法学从分子描述符建立用于预测结合常数的定量模型,而它们仅提供关于结合机制的间接信息。介绍并讨论了用于建立 PPB 预测的全局模型、自动化工作流程和基于网络的平台的努力。基于药物-蛋白复合物晶体结构的基于结构的方法提供了关于潜在机制的详细信息,但通常限于特定化合物。它们可用于识别特定的结合位点,同时在研究与 PPB 相关的药物相互作用时可能很重要。此外,化学计量学或基于结构的建模可以得到实验数据的支持,这是一种用于 ADME(T)性质优化的很有前途的综合替代策略。在 PPB 的情况下,使用分子建模结合生物分析技术常用于研究 AGP 结合。