Luengo Elisa, Martínez Juan Manuel, Coustets Mathilde, Álvarez Ignacio, Teissié Justin, Rols Marie-Pierre, Raso Javier
Tecnología de los Alimentos, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, C/Miguel Servet, 177, 50013, Saragossa, Spain.
J Membr Biol. 2015 Oct;248(5):883-91. doi: 10.1007/s00232-015-9796-7. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
The interdependencies of the two main processing parameters affecting "electroporation" (electric field strength and pulse duration) while using pulse duration in the range of milliseconds and microseconds on the permeabilization, inactivation, and extraction of pigments from Chlorella vulgaris was compared. While irreversible "electroporation" was observed above 4 kV/cm in the millisecond range, electric field strengths of ≥10 kV/cm were required in the microseconds range. However, to cause the electroporation of most of the 90 % of the population of C. vulgaris in the millisecond (5 kV/cm, 20 pulses) or microsecond (15 kV/cm, 25 pulses) range, the specific energy that was delivered was lower for microsecond treatments (16.87 kJ/L) than in millisecond treatments (150 kJ/L). In terms of the specific energy required to cause microalgae inactivation, treatments in the microsecond range also resulted in greater energy efficiency. The comparison of extraction yields in the range of milliseconds (5 kV, 20 ms) and microseconds (20, 25 pulses) under the conditions in which the maximum extraction was observed revealed that the improvement in the carotenoid extraction was similar and chlorophyll a and b extraction was slightly higher for treatments in the microsecond range. The specific energy that was required for the treatment in the millisecond range (150 kJ/L) was much higher than those required in the microsecond range (30 kJ/L). The comparison of the efficacy of both types of pulses on the extraction enhancement just after the treatment and after a post-pulse incubation period seemed to indicate that PEF in the millisecond range created irreversible alterations while, in the microsecond range, the defects were a dynamic structure along the post-pulse time that caused a subsequent increment in the extraction yield.
比较了在毫秒和微秒范围内使用脉冲持续时间时,影响“电穿孔”的两个主要处理参数(电场强度和脉冲持续时间)对小球藻透化、失活及色素提取的相互依赖性。在毫秒范围内,高于4 kV/cm时观察到不可逆的“电穿孔”,而在微秒范围内则需要≥10 kV/cm的电场强度。然而,要在毫秒(5 kV/cm,20个脉冲)或微秒(15 kV/cm,25个脉冲)范围内使90%的小球藻群体发生电穿孔,微秒处理(16.87 kJ/L)传递的比能量低于毫秒处理(150 kJ/L)。就导致微藻失活所需的比能量而言,微秒范围内的处理也具有更高的能量效率。在观察到最大提取量的条件下,比较毫秒(5 kV,20 ms)和微秒(20,25个脉冲)范围内的提取率,结果表明类胡萝卜素提取的改善相似,微秒范围内的处理对叶绿素a和b的提取略高。毫秒范围内处理所需的比能量(150 kJ/L)远高于微秒范围内所需的比能量(30 kJ/L)。比较两种类型的脉冲在处理后及脉冲后孵育期对提取增强的效果,似乎表明毫秒范围内的脉冲电场造成了不可逆的改变,而在微秒范围内,缺陷是沿脉冲后时间的动态结构,导致提取率随后增加。