Witteman Bart P L, Conchillo Jose M, Rinsma Nicolaas F, Betzel Bark, Peeters Andrea, Koek Ger H, Stassen Laurents P S, Bouvy Nicole D
1] Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands [2] Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;110(4):531-42. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.28. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) was developed in an attempt to create a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure that mimics antireflux surgery. The objective of this trial was to evaluate effectiveness of TIF compared with proton pump inhibition in a population consisting of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients controlled with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) who opted for an endoscopic intervention over lifelong drug dependence.
Patients with chronic GERD were randomized (2:1) for TIF or continuation of PPI therapy. American Society of Anesthesiologists >2, body mass index >35 kg/m(2), hiatal hernia >2 cm, and esophageal motility disorders were exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measure was GERD-related quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were esophageal acid exposure, number of reflux episodes, PPI usage, appearance of the gastroesophageal valve, and healing of reflux esophagitis. Crossover for the PPI group was allowed after 6 months.
A total of 60 patients (TIF n=40, PPI n=20, mean body mass index 26 kg/m(2), 37 male) were included. At 6 months, GERD symptoms were more improved in the TIF group compared with the PPI group (P<0.001), with a similar improvement of distal esophageal acid exposure (P=0.228) compared with baseline. The pH normalization for TIF group and PPI group was 50% and 63%, respectively. All patients allocated for PPI treatment opted for crossover. At 12 months, quality of life remained improved after TIF compared with baseline (P<0.05), but no improvement in esophageal acid exposure compared with baseline was found (P=0.171) and normalization of pH was accomplished in only 29% in conjunction with deteriorated valve appearances at endoscopy and resumption of PPIs in 61%.
Although TIF resulted in an improved GERD-related quality of life and produced a short-term improvement of the antireflux barrier in a selected group of GERD patients, no long-term objective reflux control was achieved.
经口无切口胃底折叠术(TIF)旨在创建一种微创内镜手术,模拟抗反流手术。本试验的目的是在一组由质子泵抑制剂(PPI)控制的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者中,评估TIF与质子泵抑制相比的有效性,这些患者选择内镜干预而非终身药物依赖。
慢性GERD患者随机分组(2:1)接受TIF或继续PPI治疗。美国麻醉医师协会分级>2、体重指数>35kg/m²、食管裂孔疝>2cm和食管动力障碍为排除标准。主要结局指标是GERD相关生活质量。次要结局指标是食管酸暴露、反流发作次数、PPI使用情况、胃食管瓣膜外观以及反流性食管炎的愈合情况。PPI组6个月后允许交叉治疗。
共纳入60例患者(TIF组40例,PPI组20例,平均体重指数26kg/m²,男性37例)。6个月时,与PPI组相比,TIF组GERD症状改善更明显(P<0.001),与基线相比,远端食管酸暴露改善程度相似(P=0.228)。TIF组和PPI组的pH正常化率分别为50%和63%。所有分配接受PPI治疗的患者均选择交叉治疗。12个月时,与基线相比,TIF后生活质量仍有改善(P<0.05),但与基线相比食管酸暴露无改善(P=0.171),pH正常化仅为29%,同时内镜检查时瓣膜外观恶化,61%的患者恢复使用PPI。
尽管TIF在一组特定的GERD患者中改善了GERD相关生活质量,并在短期内改善了抗反流屏障,但未实现长期的客观反流控制。