James Darren C, Farmer Laura J, Sayers Jason B, Cook David P, Mileva Katya N
Sport & Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Sport & Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, UK.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 May;30(4):347-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
The net contribution of all muscles that act about a joint can be represented as an internal joint moment profile. This approach may be advantageous when studying footwear-induced perturbations during walking since the contribution of the smaller deeper muscles that cross the ankle joint cannot be evaluated with surface electromyography. Therefore, the present study aimed to advance the understanding of FitFlop™ footwear interaction by investigating lower extremity joint moment, and kinematic and centre of pressure profiles during gait.
28 healthy participants performed 5 walking trials in 3 conditions: a FitFlop™ sandal, a conventional sandal and an athletic trainer. Three-dimensional ankle joint, and sagittal plane knee and hip joint moments, as well as corresponding kinematics and centre of pressure trajectories were evaluated.
FitFlop™ differed significantly to both the conventional sandal and athletic trainer in: average anterior position of centre of pressure trajectory (P<0.0001) and peak hip extensor moment (P=0.001) during early stance; average medial position of centre of pressure trajectory during late stance; peak ankle dorsiflexion and corresponding range of motion; peak plantarflexor moment and total negative work performed at the ankle (all P<0.0001).
The present findings demonstrate that FitFlop™ footwear significantly alters the gait pattern of wearers. An anterior displacement of the centre of pressure trajectory during early stance is the primary response to the destabilising effect of the mid-sole technology, and this leads to reductions in sagittal plane ankle joint range of motion and corresponding kinetics. Future investigations should consider the clinical implications of these findings.
作用于关节的所有肌肉的净贡献可以表示为内部关节力矩曲线。当研究步行过程中鞋类引起的扰动时,这种方法可能具有优势,因为无法通过表面肌电图评估穿过踝关节的较深层小肌肉的贡献。因此,本研究旨在通过研究步态期间的下肢关节力矩、运动学和压力中心曲线,来增进对FitFlop™鞋类相互作用的理解。
28名健康参与者在三种条件下进行了5次步行试验:FitFlop™凉鞋、传统凉鞋和运动鞋。评估了三维踝关节、矢状面膝关节和髋关节力矩,以及相应的运动学和压力中心轨迹。
FitFlop™在以下方面与传统凉鞋和运动鞋均有显著差异:早期站立时压力中心轨迹的平均前位(P<0.0001)和峰值髋伸肌力矩(P=0.001);后期站立时压力中心轨迹的平均内侧位置;峰值踝关节背屈及相应的运动范围;峰值跖屈肌力矩以及踝关节处完成的总负功(所有P<0.0001)。
本研究结果表明,FitFlop™鞋类会显著改变穿着者的步态模式。早期站立时压力中心轨迹的前移是对中底技术不稳定效应的主要反应,这会导致矢状面踝关节运动范围和相应动力学的降低。未来的研究应考虑这些发现的临床意义。