Brand Jennie E, Pfeffer Fabian T, Goldrick-Rab Sara
University of California-Los Angeles.
University of Michigan.
Sociol Sci. 2014 Oct 27;1:448-465. doi: 10.15195/v1.a25.
Community colleges are controversial educational institutions, often said to simultaneously expand college opportunities and diminish baccalaureate attainment. We assess the seemingly contradictory functions of community colleges by attending to effect heterogeneity and to alternative counterfactual conditions. Using data on postsecondary outcomes of high school graduates of Chicago Public Schools, we find that enrolling at a community college penalizes more advantaged students who otherwise would have attended four-year colleges, particularly highly selective schools; however, these students represent a relatively small portion of the community college population, and these estimates are almost certainly biased. On the other hand, enrolling at a community college has a modest positive effect on bachelor's degree completion for disadvantaged students who otherwise would not have attended college; these students represent the majority of community college goers. We conclude that discussions among scholars, policymakers, and practitioners should move beyond considering the pros and cons of community college attendance for students in general to attending to the implications of community college attendance for targeted groups of students.
社区学院是颇具争议的教育机构,人们常说它们在扩大大学教育机会的同时,却降低了学士学位的获得率。我们通过关注效应异质性和替代反事实条件来评估社区学院看似矛盾的功能。利用芝加哥公立学校高中毕业生的高等教育结果数据,我们发现,就读社区学院对那些原本会进入四年制大学、尤其是高选择性学校的条件更优越的学生不利;然而,这些学生在社区学院学生群体中所占比例相对较小,而且这些估计几乎肯定存在偏差。另一方面,就读社区学院对那些原本不会上大学的弱势学生获得学士学位有适度的积极影响;这些学生占社区学院学生的大多数。我们得出结论,学者、政策制定者和从业者之间的讨论应超越一般地考虑学生就读社区学院的利弊,转而关注社区学院就读对特定学生群体的影响。