Liu Jian, Wu Lihua, Hu Xingjiang, Wu Guolan, Zheng Yunliang, Zhou Huili, Zhai You, Zhu Meixiang, ShenTu Jianzhong
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Jul;53(7):573-81. doi: 10.5414/CP202208.
The aim of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles between a new generic and a branded reference formulation of irbesartan/ hydrochlorothiazide FDC tablets, and to assess the bioequivalence of the two products in healthy Chinese male volunteers.
24 male healthy volunteers participated in the open-label, single-dose, randomized-sequence, 2-way crossover study. Eligible subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a single 300/12.5-mg dose of either the test or reference formulation followed by a 1-week washout. Blood samples were obtained before (0 hours) and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after dosing. Plasma concentrations of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide were analyzed by two separate validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC-MS/MS) methods.
For irbesartan, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax were 103.27-116.71%, 105.01-121.47%, and 84.15-96.88%, respectively. For hydrochlorothiazide, the 90% CIs of AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax were 96.11-109.02%, 95.15-107.35%, and 91.66-101.40%, respectively. A total of 3 mild AEs were reported in 3 subjects (12.5%).
In this study, a single dose (300/12.5-mg) of the test formulation of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide FDC tablet in fasting healthy Chinese male volunteers met WHO's and China's FDA regulatory criteria for assumption of bioequivalence to the reference formulation based on AUC and Cmax. Both formulations were well tolerated.
本研究旨在比较厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方片剂的新通用型制剂与品牌参比制剂之间的药代动力学特征,并评估这两种产品在健康中国男性志愿者中的生物等效性。
24名男性健康志愿者参与了这项开放标签、单剂量、随机序列、双交叉研究。符合条件的受试者被随机分配(1:1)接受单剂量300/12.5毫克的试验制剂或参比制剂,随后进行1周的洗脱期。在给药前(0小时)以及给药后0.5、1、1.5、2、2.5、3、4、5、6、8、12、24、36、48和72小时采集血样。采用两种独立验证的液相色谱/串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)方法分析血浆中厄贝沙坦和氢氯噻嗪的浓度。
对于厄贝沙坦,AUC0-t、AUC0-∞和Cmax的90%置信区间(CI)分别为103.27-116.71%、105.01-121.47%和84.15-96.88%。对于氢氯噻嗪,AUC0-t、AUC0-∞和Cmax的90%CI分别为96.11-109.02%、95.15-107.35%和91.66-101.40%。共有3名受试者(12.5%)报告了3例轻度不良事件。
在本研究中,空腹健康中国男性志愿者单次服用300/12.5毫克的厄贝沙坦/氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方试验制剂,基于AUC和Cmax符合世界卫生组织和中国食品药品监督管理局关于假定与参比制剂生物等效的监管标准。两种制剂耐受性良好。