• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜手术治疗憩室病:300余例连续患者的经验

Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.

作者信息

Vestweber Boris, Vestweber Karl-Heinz, Paul Claudia, Rink Andreas D

机构信息

Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Leverkusen General Hospital, Am Gesundheitspark 11, 51375, Leverkusen, Germany.

King Edward VII Memorial Hospital, PO Box HM 1023, Hamilton, HM DX, Bermuda.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):50-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4160-7. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-015-4160-7
PMID:25829061
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new minimally invasive technique, which has been developed to minimize the surgical access trauma. For colorectal resection, the access trauma can be limited to the one incision, which is needed for specimen extraction anyways, but dissection might be more demanding than in multiport laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of SILS for the treatment of diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon.

METHODS

Between July 2009 and December 2013, a total of 329 consecutive patients with intended SILS sigmoid colectomy for complicated or frequently recurring diverticulitis were studied. Clinical data were collected in a prospective database. Telephone follow-ups were performed to evaluate long-term morbidity and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 329 patients (139 male) with intended SILS sigmoid colectomy, 309 were successfully operated on in SILS technique, while 20 (6.1%) were converted to open surgery. The mean duration of surgery was 153.5 (65-434) min. Total morbidity rate was 18.3%. Anastomotic leakage was the most serious complication occurring in 13 patients (leak rate 4%) with one consecutive death (mortality rate 0.3%). Quality of life had significantly improved 6 months after surgery in comparison with the preoperative value. At a mean follow-up of 18.6 months, 16 patients (4.9%) had incisional hernia and one patient had recurrent diverticulitis.

CONCLUSION

In spite of almost 5% incisional hernia 6 months after surgery, single-incision sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis is feasible and save and is therefore an alternative to multiport laparoscopic surgery. Further trials are necessary to evaluate its benefits over multiport laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

背景

单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)是一种新的微创技术,其开发目的是将手术入路创伤降至最低。对于结直肠切除术,入路创伤可局限于一个切口,而无论如何这个切口都是取出标本所必需的,但与多端口腹腔镜手术相比,解剖操作可能要求更高。本研究的目的是评估SILS治疗乙状结肠憩室病的有效性。

方法

2009年7月至2013年12月,共对329例因复杂性或复发性憩室炎拟行SILS乙状结肠切除术的连续患者进行了研究。临床数据收集于前瞻性数据库。通过电话随访评估长期发病率和生活质量。

结果

在329例(139例男性)拟行SILS乙状结肠切除术的患者中,309例成功采用SILS技术完成手术,20例(6.1%)转为开放手术。平均手术时间为153.5(65 - 434)分钟。总发病率为18.3%。吻合口漏是最严重的并发症,13例患者发生(漏出率4%),有1例连续死亡(死亡率0.3%)。与术前相比,术后6个月生活质量有显著改善。平均随访18.6个月时,16例患者(4.9%)发生切口疝,1例患者发生复发性憩室炎。

结论

尽管术后6个月切口疝发生率近5%,但单切口乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎是可行且安全的,因此是多端口腹腔镜手术的一种替代方法。有必要进行进一步试验以评估其相对于多端口腹腔镜手术的优势。

相似文献

1
Single-port laparoscopic resection for diverticular disease: experiences with more than 300 consecutive patients.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗憩室病:300余例连续患者的经验
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):50-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4160-7. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Defining the role of laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.明确腹腔镜辅助乙状结肠切除术在憩室炎治疗中的作用。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1726-31. doi: 10.1007/BF02236858.
3
Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic single-port sigmoid resection: combined transanal and transabdominal minimal invasive management.腹腔镜单孔乙状结肠切除术后吻合口漏:经肛门与经腹联合微创治疗
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3803-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4138-5. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis in overweight patients.超重患者憩室炎的单切口腹腔镜手术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Oct;400(7):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1333-8. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for complicated diverticulitis is safe: review of 576 consecutive colectomies.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗复杂性憩室炎是安全的:对576例连续结肠切除术的回顾
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1629-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4393-5. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
6
Laparoscopic colectomy for recurrent and complicated diverticulitis: a prospective study of 396 patients.腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗复发性和复杂性憩室炎:396例患者的前瞻性研究
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004 Apr;389(2):97-103. doi: 10.1007/s00423-003-0454-7. Epub 2004 Feb 17.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: outcomes from 224 colonic resections performed at a single center using SILS.单孔腹腔镜手术:单中心使用 SILS 进行的 224 例结肠切除手术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Feb;27(2):434-42. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2454-6. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
8
Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease.与非憩室疾病相比,腹腔镜结肠切除术治疗憩室炎并不会增加发病率。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005 Mar;20(2):165-72. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0649-6. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
9
Are there differences in outcome after elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease and for cancer? A national inpatient study.憩室病和癌症行择期乙状结肠切除术后的结局是否存在差异?一项全国性住院患者研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Mar;19(3):260-265. doi: 10.1111/codi.13461.
10
Robotic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy in sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease-a comparison of operative trauma and cost-effectiveness: retrospective, single-center analysis.机器人手术与传统腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病的手术创伤和成本效益比较:回顾性单中心分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 27;409(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03382-0.

引用本文的文献

1
An evidence map and synthesis review with meta-analysis on the risk of incisional hernia in colorectal surgery with standard closure.在标准缝合的结直肠手术中,切口疝风险的证据图谱和综合分析综述及荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):411-436. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02555-w. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Health-related quality of life and functional disorders after diverticular surgery.憩室手术后与健康相关的生活质量和功能障碍
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Dec 23;14:17562848211066437. doi: 10.1177/17562848211066437. eCollection 2021.
3
The single-incision laparoscopic surgery technique has questionable advantages in colorectal surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis.乙状结肠憩室炎治疗的实践参数。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Mar;57(3):284-94. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000075.
2
Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy.中线剖腹术后 3 年的切口疝发生率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):51-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9364. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision versus conventional multiport appendicectomy.单切口与传统多孔阑尾切除术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
单切口腹腔镜手术技术在结直肠手术中的优势存疑。
Innov Surg Sci. 2018 Mar 22;3(1):77-84. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0048. eCollection 2018 Mar.
4
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
5
Suprapubic single-port approach for complicated diverticulitis.耻骨上单孔入路治疗复杂憩室炎。
Tech Coloproctol. 2018 Sep;22(9):657-662. doi: 10.1007/s10151-018-1843-9. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
6
Elective colonic resection after acute diverticulitis improves quality of life, intestinal symptoms and functional outcome: experts' perspectives and review of literature.急性憩室炎后择期结肠切除术可改善生活质量、肠道症状及功能结局:专家观点与文献综述
Updates Surg. 2016 Mar;68(1):53-8. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0349-0. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis in overweight patients.超重患者憩室炎的单切口腹腔镜手术
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Oct;400(7):797-804. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1333-8. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
Br J Surg. 2013 Dec;100(13):1709-18. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9296.
4
Transvaginal/transumbilical hybrid--NOTES--versus 3-trocar needlescopic cholecystectomy: short-term results of a randomized clinical trial.经阴道/经脐混合式——NOTES——与三套管针腹腔镜胆囊切除术的对比:一项随机临床试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2015 Mar;261(3):451-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000218.
5
Single incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术结局的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 2;8(10):e76530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076530. eCollection 2013.
6
Surgical management of complicated diverticulitis: a comparison of the laparoscopic and open approaches.复杂憩室炎的手术治疗:腹腔镜与开放手术的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):782-8; discussion 788-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.003.
7
Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures.1145 例连续经脐单切口腹腔镜手术的伤口并发症。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jan;259(1):89-95. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b7818.
8
Initial experience of single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon cancer.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗乙状结肠癌的初步经验。
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):652-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1882-8.
9
The evolving role of laparoscopy in colonic diverticular disease: a systematic review.腹腔镜在结肠憩室病中的作用演变:系统评价。
World J Surg. 2013 Mar;37(3):629-38. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1872-x.
10
Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.随机对照临床试验:单孔、迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):339-49. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9003. Epub 2012 Nov 27.