Suppr超能文献

两种经颅磁刺激偏头痛触发点去活技术的前瞻性随机结局比较。

A Prospective Randomized Outcomes Comparison of Two Temple Migraine Trigger Site Deactivation Techniques.

机构信息

Cleveland and Lyndhurst, Ohio From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Case Medical Center; and the American Migraine Center.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jul;136(1):159-165. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001322.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The authors compared the reduction of migraine headache frequency, days, severity, and duration after surgical decompression versus avulsion of the zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve for treatment of temporal migraine headache.

METHODS

Twenty patients with bilateral temporal migraine headache were randomized to undergo avulsion of the zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve on one side and decompression via fasciotomy and removal of the zygomaticotemporal artery on the other side. Results were analyzed after a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed the study. The patients experienced greater than 50 percent improvement in frequency, migraine days, severity, and duration in 34 of the 38 operative sites (89 percent). Complete elimination of symptoms was noted in 21 of the 38 operative sites (55 percent). In the decompression group, migraine frequency was reduced from 14.6 to 2.2 per month, migraine days from 14.1 to 2.3, severity from 7.0 to 2.9, duration from 9.6 to 4.8 hours, and Migraine Headache Index score from 42 to 2.9. In the neurectomy group, frequency decreased from 14.2 to 1.9 per month, migraine days from 14.1 to 2.3, severity from 6.8 to 2.6, migraine duration from 10.1 to 5.3 hours, and the Migraine Headache Index score from 41 to 2.5. There was no statistical significance in reduced migraine headache frequency, days, severity, and duration between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurectomy and decompression of the zygomaticotemporal branch of the trigeminal nerve are both appropriate treatment for temporal migraine headache. If decompression fails to provide sufficient relief, neurectomy is another option.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

摘要

背景

作者比较了手术减压与三叉神经颧颞支撕脱术治疗颞部偏头痛头痛的频率、天数、严重程度和持续时间的减少。

方法

20 例双侧颞部偏头痛头痛患者随机分为单侧三叉神经颧颞支撕脱术和另一侧筋膜切开减压及切除颧颞动脉。至少随访 12 个月后分析结果。

结果

19 例患者完成了研究。38 个手术部位中有 34 个(89%)的频率、偏头痛天数、严重程度和持续时间改善超过 50%。38 个手术部位中有 21 个(55%)完全消除了症状。在减压组,偏头痛频率从每月 14.6 次降至 2.2 次,偏头痛天数从 14.1 天降至 2.3 天,严重程度从 7.0 分降至 2.9 分,持续时间从 9.6 小时降至 4.8 小时,偏头痛头痛指数评分从 42 分降至 2.9 分。在神经切断组,频率从每月 14.2 次降至 1.9 次,偏头痛天数从 14.1 天降至 2.3 天,严重程度从 6.8 分降至 2.6 分,偏头痛持续时间从 10.1 小时降至 5.3 小时,偏头痛头痛指数评分从 41 分降至 2.5 分。两组之间偏头痛头痛频率、天数、严重程度和持续时间的减少无统计学意义。

结论

三叉神经颧颞支的神经切断术和减压术都是治疗颞部偏头痛头痛的合适方法。如果减压术不能提供足够的缓解,神经切断术是另一种选择。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗,I 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验