Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, Tucson, AZ, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1243-50. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv011. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
To establish preferred strategies for presenting drug-drug interaction (DDI) clinical decision support alerts.
A DDI Clinical Decision Support Conference Series included a workgroup consisting of 24 clinical, usability, and informatics experts representing academia, health information technology (IT) vendors, healthcare organizations, and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT. Workgroup members met via web-based meetings 12 times from January 2013 to February 2014, and two in-person meetings to reach consensus on recommendations to improve decision support for DDIs. We addressed three key questions: (1) what, how, where, and when do we display DDI decision support? (2) should presentation of DDI decision support vary by clinicians? and (3) how should effectiveness of DDI decision support be measured?
Our recommendations include the consistent use of terminology, visual cues, minimal text, formatting, content, and reporting standards to facilitate usability. All clinicians involved in the medication use process should be able to view DDI alerts and actions by other clinicians. Override rates are common but may not be a good measure of effectiveness.
Seven core elements should be included with DDI decision support. DDI information should be presented to all clinicians. Finally, in their current form, override rates have limited capability to evaluate alert effectiveness.
DDI clinical decision support alerts need major improvements. We provide recommendations for healthcare organizations and IT vendors to improve the clinician interface of DDI alerts, with the aim of reducing alert fatigue and improving patient safety.
确定药物相互作用(DDI)临床决策支持警报的首选呈现策略。
DDI 临床决策支持会议系列包括一个工作组,由 24 名临床、可用性和信息学专家组成,代表学术界、医疗信息技术(IT)供应商、医疗机构和国家卫生信息技术协调办公室。工作组通过网络会议于 2013 年 1 月至 2014 年 2 月期间进行了 12 次会议,并举行了两次面对面会议,就改进 DDI 决策支持的建议达成共识。我们解决了三个关键问题:(1)我们如何在何处以及何时显示 DDI 决策支持?(2)DDI 决策支持的呈现是否应因临床医生而异?(3)如何衡量 DDI 决策支持的有效性?
我们的建议包括使用术语、视觉提示、最少文本、格式、内容和报告标准,以提高可用性。所有参与用药过程的临床医生都应该能够查看 DDI 警报和其他临床医生的操作。覆盖率很常见,但可能不是衡量有效性的好方法。
DDI 临床决策支持警报应包括七个核心要素。应向所有临床医生提供 DDI 信息。最后,在其当前形式下,覆盖率具有有限的能力来评估警报的有效性。
DDI 临床决策支持警报需要进行重大改进。我们为医疗机构和 IT 供应商提供了改进 DDI 警报的临床医生界面的建议,旨在减少警报疲劳并提高患者安全性。