Rey Michel, Rodriguez-Lecompte Juan, Undi Michael, Joseph Tomy, Morrison Jason, Yitbarek Alex, Wittenberg Karin, Tremblay Robert, Crow Gary, Ominski Kim
Department of Animal Science (Rey, Undi, Yitbarek, Wittenberg, Crow, Ominski), Department of Biosystems Engineering (Morrison) & Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine (Joseph), University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2; Animal Health Centre, BC Ministry of Agriculture, 1767 Angus Campbell Road, Abbotsford, British Columbia V3G 2M3 (Joseph); Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 500 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3 (Rodriguez-Lecompte); Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., Burlington, Ontario L7L 5H4 (Tremblay).
Can Vet J. 2015 Apr;56(4):405-7.
This study compared needle-free and needle-based injection devices for vaccination of calves against Clostridium chauvoei in warm and cold conditions. Both devices elicited comparable antibody responses in calves. Needle-free injection devices can be used to vaccinate calves provided appropriate precautions are taken in cold weather.
本研究比较了无针注射装置和有针注射装置在温暖和寒冷条件下对犊牛进行产气荚膜梭菌疫苗接种的效果。两种装置在犊牛体内引发的抗体反应相当。只要在寒冷天气采取适当的预防措施,无针注射装置可用于给犊牛接种疫苗。