• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克服儿科癌症研究中全基因组测序获得有意义的知情同意的挑战。

Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.

作者信息

Oberg Jennifer A, Glade Bender Julia L, Cohn Elizabeth G, Morris Marilyn, Ruiz Jenny, Chung Wendy K, Appelbaum Paul S, Kung Andrew L, Levine Jennifer M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, IP7, New York, New York.

School of Nursing, Division of Academics, Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, IP7, New York, New York.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Aug;62(8):1374-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25520. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1002/pbc.25520
PMID:25832998
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Introducing whole genome sequencing (WGS) into pediatric cancer research at diagnosis poses unique challenges related to informed consent. WGS requires tissue obtained prior to initiating treatment, when families may be overwhelmed with uncertainty and fear. Motivation to participate may be high without fully understanding the range of possible results, including secondary findings. Little is known about parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about this type of research.

PROCEDURE

A qualitative study was conducted to investigate parental knowledge about genetic concepts and WGS, thoughts about the informed consent process, and preferences for secondary findings. Focus groups were conducted with parents/guardians of children with cancer and semi-structured interviews were conducted in a control group without cancer. All transcripts were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

Four focus groups included 15 participants; eight semi-structured interviews included 10 participants. Basic knowledge about genetics was limited to heredity. Some knowledge of genomic analysis was present in 3/15 focus group participants. Major factors related to participation in WGS research were: (i) hope for their child and future children; (ii) no additional procedures; (iii) and protection of privacy. All favored a two-step consent process, first to store extra tissue from a diagnostic biopsy/resection, followed by consenting to WGS research, one-to-two months later. The desire to receive secondary findings was high among both groups, but there were individuals who did not want these results, fearing increased anxiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents/guardians of children with cancer have limited knowledge about WGS. A two-step consent process may improve their ability to provide meaningful informed consent.

摘要

背景

在儿科癌症诊断研究中引入全基因组测序(WGS)带来了与知情同意相关的独特挑战。WGS需要在开始治疗前获取组织样本,而此时家庭可能因不确定性和恐惧而不堪重负。在没有充分理解包括次要发现在内的可能结果范围的情况下,参与的积极性可能很高。关于父母对这类研究的知识、态度和信念知之甚少。

程序

进行了一项定性研究,以调查父母对遗传概念和WGS的了解、对知情同意过程的看法以及对次要发现的偏好。对癌症患儿的父母/监护人进行了焦点小组访谈,并对无癌症的对照组进行了半结构化访谈。所有访谈记录均采用内容分析法进行分析。

结果

四个焦点小组包括15名参与者;八个半结构化访谈包括10名参与者。关于遗传学的基本知识仅限于遗传。15名焦点小组参与者中有3人对基因组分析有一定了解。参与WGS研究的主要因素包括:(i)对自己孩子和未来孩子的希望;(ii)无需额外程序;(iii)隐私保护。所有人都赞成分两步进行同意程序,首先是存储诊断性活检/切除的多余组织,然后在一到两个月后同意进行WGS研究。两组中对接收次要发现的意愿都很高,但也有一些人不想要这些结果,担心会增加焦虑。

结论

癌症患儿的父母/监护人对WGS的了解有限。分两步进行的同意程序可能会提高他们提供有意义的知情同意的能力。

相似文献

1
Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.克服儿科癌症研究中全基因组测序获得有意义的知情同意的挑战。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Aug;62(8):1374-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25520. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
2
Parental perspectives on consent for participation in large-scale, non-biological data repositories.父母对于参与大规模非生物数据存储库的同意问题的看法。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2016;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s40504-016-0034-6. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Factors that influence parental decisions to participate in clinical research: consenters vs nonconsenters.影响父母参与临床研究决策的因素:同意者与不同意者。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun;167(6):561-6. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.1050.
4
Clinical trials in pediatric cancer: parental perspectives on informed consent.儿童癌症临床试验:父母对知情同意的看法。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2003 Oct;25(10):787-90. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200310000-00009.
5
The quality of parental consent for research with children: a prospective repeated measure self-report survey.儿童研究中父母同意的质量:一项前瞻性重复测量自我报告调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 May;44(4):525-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 May 18.
6
Understanding of informed consent by parents of children enrolled in a genetic biobank.遗传生物库入组儿童家长对知情同意的理解。
Genet Med. 2014 Feb;16(2):141-8. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.86. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
7
Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing.父母对使用全基因组测序进行扩大新生儿筛查的看法。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S36-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731H.
8
Factors Influencing Parental Willingness to Consent to a Survey Study for Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.影响儿科急诊患者父母同意参与调查研究的意愿的因素。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 May 1;40(5):e33-e39. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003126. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Parental Perceptions About Informed Consent/Assent in Pediatric Research in Jordan.约旦父母对儿科研究中知情同意/赞成的看法。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Oct;12(4):261-268. doi: 10.1177/1556264617718937. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
10
Improving informed consent: suggestions from parents of children with leukemia.改善知情同意:白血病患儿家长的建议
Pediatrics. 2007 Apr;119(4):e849-59. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2208.

引用本文的文献

1
Expanding implementation of pediatric whole-genome sequencing: Insights from SeqFirst providers to inform equitable access to a precise genetic diagnosis.扩大儿科全基因组测序的应用:来自SeqFirst供应商的见解,以促进公平获得精确的基因诊断。
HGG Adv. 2025 Jun 3;6(4):100464. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2025.100464.
2
Ethical Issues in Pediatric Precision Oncology in Singapore.新加坡儿科精准肿瘤学中的伦理问题。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Mar 3;17(2):293-306. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00351-z. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Ethical frameworks of informed consent in the age of pediatric precision medicine.
儿科精准医学时代的知情同意伦理框架。
Camb Prism Precis Med. 2024 May 6;2:e6. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2024.3. eCollection 2024.
4
Experiences of pediatric cancer patients (age 12-18 years) with extensive germline sequencing for cancer predisposition: a qualitative study.青少年癌症患者(12-18 岁)广泛进行癌症易感性种系测序的体验:一项定性研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 May;32(5):567-575. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01565-3. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Parents' expectations, preferences, and recall of germline findings in a childhood cancer precision medicine trial.父母对儿童癌症精准医学试验中种系研究结果的期望、偏好和回忆。
Cancer. 2023 Nov 15;129(22):3620-3632. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34917. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
6
Parental Preferences Surrounding Timing and Content of Consent Conversations for Clinical Germline Genetic Testing Following a Child's New Cancer Diagnosis.父母对儿童新发癌症诊断后临床种系遗传检测的同意谈话时间和内容的偏好。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2022 Oct;6:e2200323. doi: 10.1200/PO.22.00323.
7
Parents' experiences with large-scale sequencing for genetic predisposition in pediatric renal cancer: A qualitative study.父母在小儿肾细胞癌遗传易感性大规模测序中的体验:一项定性研究。
Psychooncology. 2022 Oct;31(10):1692-1699. doi: 10.1002/pon.6016. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
8
The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review.儿科全基因组测序中的伦理问题全景:系统定性综述。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 6;21(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02830-w.
9
Whether, when, how, and how much? General public's and cancer patients' views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findings.是否、何时、如何以及多少?一般公众和癌症患者对基因组二级发现披露的看法。
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Jun 26;14(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-01016-8.
10
Whole-Genome and Whole-Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Oncology: An Assessment of Parent and Young Adult Patient Knowledge, Attitudes, and Expectations.儿科肿瘤学中的全基因组和全外显子组测序:对家长及年轻成年患者知识、态度和期望的评估
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Mar 14;2. doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00104. eCollection 2018.