• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

要求作出承诺:2007年比赛期间的违规行为及其对申请人排名列表的影响。

Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists.

作者信息

Hern H Gene, Johnson Brian, Alter Harrison J, Wills Charlotte P, Snoey Eric R, Simon Barry C

机构信息

Alameda Health System - Highland Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oakland, California.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):331-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24462. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24462
PMID:25834683
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4380392/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Applicants to residency face a number of difficult questions during the interview process, one of which is when a program asks for a commitment to rank the program highly. The regulations governing the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) match explicitly forbid any residency programs asking for a commitment.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of applicants from U.S. medical schools to five specialties during the 2006-2007 interview season using the Electronic Residency Application Service of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Applicants were asked to recall being asked to provide any sort of commitment (verbal or otherwise) to rank a program highly. Surveys were sent after rank lists were submitted, but before match day. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

RESULTS

There were 7,028 unique responses out of 11,983 surveys sent for a response rate of 58.6%. Of those who identified their specialty (emergency medicine, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology [OBGYN], general surgery and orthopedics), there were 6,303 unique responders. Overall 19.6% (1380/7028) of all respondents were asked to commit to a program. Orthopedics had the highest overall prevalence at 28.9% (372/474), followed by OBGYN (23.7%; 180/759), general surgery (21.7%; 190/876), internal medicine (18.3%; 601/3278), and finally, emergency medicine (15.4%; 141/916). Of those responding, 38.4% stated such questions made them less likely to rank the program.

CONCLUSION

Applicants to residencies are being asked questions expressly forbidden by the NRMP. Among the five specialties surveyed, orthopedics and OBGYN had the highest incidence of this violation. Asking for a commitment makes applicants less likely to rank a program highly.

摘要

引言

住院医师培训项目的申请者在面试过程中会面临一些难题,其中之一就是当某个项目要求他们承诺将该项目排在较高位置时。管理全国住院医师匹配项目(NRMP)匹配的规定明确禁止任何住院医师培训项目提出此类承诺要求。

方法

我们在2006 - 2007年面试季期间,使用美国医学院协会的电子住院医师申请服务,对来自美国医学院的五个专业的申请者进行了横断面调查。申请者被要求回忆是否被要求对将某个项目排在较高位置做出任何形式的承诺(口头或其他方式)。调查问卷在排名列表提交后、匹配日之前发送。我们使用描述性统计和逻辑回归分析数据。

结果

在发出的11,983份调查问卷中,有7,028份得到了有效回复,回复率为58.6%。在那些明确了自己专业(急诊医学、内科、妇产科[OBGYN]、普通外科和骨科)的人中,有6,303人做出了有效回复。总体而言,所有受访者中有19.6%(1380/7028)被要求对某个项目做出承诺。骨科的总体发生率最高,为28.9%(372/474),其次是妇产科(23.7%;180/759)、普通外科(21.7%;190/876)、内科(18.3%;601/3278),最后是急诊医学(15.4%;141/916)。在做出回复的人中,38.4%表示此类问题使他们将该项目排在较高位置的可能性降低。

结论

住院医师培训项目的申请者正被问到NRMP明确禁止的问题。在所调查的五个专业中,骨科和妇产科这种违规行为的发生率最高。要求做出承诺会使申请者将该项目排在较高位置的可能性降低。

相似文献

1
Asking for a commitment: violations during the 2007 match and the effect on applicant rank lists.要求作出承诺:2007年比赛期间的违规行为及其对申请人排名列表的影响。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):331-5. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24462. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
2
Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.急诊医学住院医师培训项目申请人对配对过程中不道德招募行为和非法提问的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00413.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
3
How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews?住院医师面试中存在多少潜在非法问题?
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1116-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299eecc.
4
Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.放射肿瘤学全国住院医师匹配计划的完整性:申请人经历的全国性调查。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):525-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.02.032. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
5
Applicant Interview Experiences and Postinterview Communication of the 2016 Radiation Oncology Match Cycle.2016年放射肿瘤学住院医师匹配周期的申请人面试经历及面试后沟通情况
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):514-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
6
Poly-Specialty Application Practices of Medical Students Applying to Integrated Vascular Surgery Residency.申请综合血管外科住院医师培训的医学生的多专业申请实践。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Nov;69:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
7
Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.耳鼻喉科住院医师匹配中的面试前沟通:申请人视角。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):28-32. doi: 10.1002/lary.28575. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
8
General Surgery Residency Applicant Perspectives on Alternative Residency Interview Models with Implementation of an Optional Second Look Day.普通外科住院医师申请人对可选第二观察日实施的替代住院医师面试模式的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2024 Nov;81(11):1784-1791. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
9
The integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program: results of a national study.皮肤病学住院医师匹配项目的完整性:一项全国性研究的结果。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Oct;63(4):594-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.11.009.
10
Impact of Match Violations on Applicants' Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs.匹配违规行为对申请人对住院医师培训项目的认知及排名的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Jan 20;13(1):e12823. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12823.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Match Violations on Applicants' Perceptions and Rankings of Residency Programs.匹配违规行为对申请人对住院医师培训项目的认知及排名的影响。
Cureus. 2021 Jan 20;13(1):e12823. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12823.
2
Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.面试后沟通方式的趋势
Laryngoscope. 2019 Mar;129(3):607-612. doi: 10.1002/lary.27331. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
3
Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.2016 年和 2017 年导师与项目联系和申请人排名披露与玻璃体视网膜研究员申请人最终匹配结果的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):642-647. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1107.
4
The prevalence and cost of medical student visiting rotations.医学生见习轮转的患病率及成本。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0805-z.

本文引用的文献

1
How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews?住院医师面试中存在多少潜在非法问题?
Acad Med. 2013 Aug;88(8):1116-21. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299eecc.
2
A piece of my mind. Manipulation and the match.我的一点想法。操纵与比赛。
JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1266-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1388.
3
Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.急诊医学住院医师培训项目申请人对配对过程中不道德招募行为和非法提问的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00413.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
4
Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.专业素养与住院医师匹配:一个儿科住院医师培训项目的面试后无通知政策及其对申请人的影响。
Pediatrics. 2007 Oct;120(4):e826-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3189. Epub 2007 Sep 3.
5
The origins, history, and design of the resident match.住院医师匹配项目的起源、历史及设计
JAMA. 2003 Feb 19;289(7):909-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.909.
6
General surgery program directors' perceptions of the match.普通外科项目主任对住院医师匹配的看法。
Curr Surg. 2000 Sep 1;57(5):460-465. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7944(00)00309-3.
7
Recruitment behavior and program directors: how ethical are their perspectives about the match process?招生行为与项目主任:他们对匹配过程的看法有多符合道德规范?
Fam Med. 2000 Apr;32(4):258-60.
8
Is match ethics an oxymoron?匹配伦理是一种自相矛盾的说法吗?
Am J Surg. 1999 Mar;177(3):237-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(99)00019-7.