• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物样本库的交互式多媒体知情同意:一项随机试验。

Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.

作者信息

Simon Christian M, Klein David W, Schartz Helen A

机构信息

Program in Bioethics and Humanities, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):57-64. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.33. Epub 2015 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1038/gim.2015.33
PMID:25834945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4592360/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The potential of interactive multimedia to improve biobank informed consent has yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to test the separate effectiveness of interactivity and multimedia at improving participant understanding and confidence in understanding of informed consent compared with a standard, face-to-face (F2F) biobank consent process.

METHODS

A 2 (face-to-face versus multimedia) × 2 (standard versus enhanced interactivity) experimental design was used with 200 patients randomly assigned to receive informed consent. All patients received the same information provided in the biobank's nine-page consent document.

RESULTS

Interactivity (F(1,196) = 7.56, P = 0.007, partial η(2) = 0.037) and media (F(1,196) = 4.27, P = 0.04, partial η(2) = 0.021) independently improved participants' understanding of the biobank consent. Interactivity (F(1,196) = 6.793, P = 0.01, partial η(2) = 0.033), but not media (F(1,196) = 0.455, not significant), resulted in increased participant confidence in their understanding of the biobank's consent materials. Patients took more time to complete the multimedia condition (mean = 18.2 min) than the face-to-face condition (mean = 12.6 min).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that interactivity and multimedia each can be effective at promoting an individual's understanding and confidence in their understanding of a biobank consent, albeit with additional time investment. Researchers should not assume that multimedia is inherently interactive, but rather should separate the two constructs when studying electronic consent.

摘要

目的

交互式多媒体在改善生物样本库知情同意方面的潜力尚未得到研究。本研究的目的是测试与标准的面对面(F2F)生物样本库同意程序相比,交互性和多媒体在提高参与者对知情同意的理解和理解信心方面的单独效果。

方法

采用2(面对面与多媒体)×2(标准与增强交互性)实验设计,随机分配200名患者接受知情同意。所有患者都收到了生物样本库九页同意文件中提供的相同信息。

结果

交互性(F(1,196)=7.56,P=0.007,偏η(2)=0.037)和媒体(F(1,196)=4.27,P=0.04,偏η(2)=0.021)独立地提高了参与者对生物样本库同意的理解。交互性(F(1,196)=6.793,P=0.01,偏η(2)=0.033),但不是媒体(F(1,196)=0.455,不显著),导致参与者对其对生物样本库同意材料的理解信心增加。患者完成多媒体条件(平均=18.2分钟)比面对面条件(平均=12.6分钟)花费更多时间。

结论

本研究表明,交互性和多媒体各自都可以有效地促进个人对生物样本库同意的理解和理解信心,尽管需要额外的时间投入。研究人员不应假设多媒体本质上是交互式的,而应在研究电子同意时将这两种结构分开。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/6efa732c56f2/nihms-665224-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/b25c8dbfe71f/nihms-665224-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/00509443a729/nihms-665224-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/6efa732c56f2/nihms-665224-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/b25c8dbfe71f/nihms-665224-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/00509443a729/nihms-665224-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45b1/4592360/6efa732c56f2/nihms-665224-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Interactive multimedia consent for biobanking: a randomized trial.生物样本库的交互式多媒体知情同意:一项随机试验。
Genet Med. 2016 Jan;18(1):57-64. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.33. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
2
Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes.与不同患者沟通参与生物库研究:一项比较电子和面对面知情同意过程的随机多中心研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):144-166. doi: 10.1177/15562646211038819. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
3
An effective multisource informed consent procedure for research and clinical practice: an observational study of patient understanding and awareness of their roles as research stakeholders in a cancer biobank.一种有效的多源知情同意程序,适用于研究和临床实践:一项观察性研究,调查患者对其作为癌症生物库研究利益相关者的角色的理解和认知。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 30;14:30. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-30.
4
Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.提高研究知情同意过程中的理解:54 项随机对照试验中测试的干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 23;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.
5
Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy.使用基于多媒体的程序改善手术患者的知情同意情况?一项针对胆囊切除术前患者的前瞻性随机多中心研究结果。
Ann Surg. 2008 Aug;248(2):205-11. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318180a3a7.
6
Comprehension by Caregivers and Adolescents of Clinical Trial Information Delivered via Multimedia Video Versus Conventional Practice: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.通过多媒体视频与传统方式向护理人员和青少年传达临床试验信息的理解情况:非随机对照试验。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2023 Jun 22;6:e44252. doi: 10.2196/44252.
7
Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.生物样本库的知情同意:基于共识的充分理解指南。
Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):226-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.102. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
8
Standard Versus Simplified Consent Materials for Biobank Participation: Differences in Patient Knowledge and Trial Accrual.生物样本库参与的标准同意书与简化同意书:患者知识及试验入组情况的差异
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):326-334. doi: 10.1177/1556264617731869. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
9
Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent for Biobanking: A Systematic Review.参与者对生物样本库知情同意的理解:一项系统综述
Clin Nurs Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):30-51. doi: 10.1177/1054773817722690. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
10
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.提高研究参与者对研究知情同意理解的干预措施:一项系统综述
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1593-601. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalized and longitudinal electronic informed consent in clinical trials: How to move the needle?临床试验中的个性化与纵向电子知情同意书:如何取得进展?
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 23;10:20552076231222361. doi: 10.1177/20552076231222361. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
3
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Traditional and electronic informed consent for biobanking: a survey of U.S. biobanks.生物样本库的传统知情同意书与电子知情同意书:一项关于美国生物样本库的调查
Biopreserv Biobank. 2014 Dec;12(6):423-9. doi: 10.1089/bio.2014.0045.
2
Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research.测试用于大型人群生物样本库研究的在线动态同意门户网站。
Public Health Genomics. 2015;18(1):26-39. doi: 10.1159/000366128. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
3
Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension.生物样本库的知情同意:基于共识的充分理解指南。
患者在数字健康背景下对知情同意的观点和偏好:最新文献综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507.
4
Development and Pilot of a REDCap Electronic Informed Consent Form for Research: An Example from the ROPE Study.用于研究的 REDCap 电子知情同意书的开发与试点:以 ROPE 研究为例
J Inform Nurs. 2021;6(3):1-8.
5
Ten years of dynamic consent in the CHRIS study: informed consent as a dynamic process.CHRIS 研究中的十年动态同意:知情同意作为一个动态过程。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1391-1397. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01160-4. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
6
Education and Consent for Population-Based DNA Screening: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of the Early Check Newborn Screening Pilot Study.基于人群的DNA筛查的教育与知情同意:早期检查新生儿筛查试点研究的混合方法评估
Front Genet. 2022 May 12;13:891592. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.891592. eCollection 2022.
7
An Integrated, Scalable, Electronic Video Consent Process to Power Precision Health Research: Large, Population-Based, Cohort Implementation and Scalability Study.一种集成、可扩展的电子视频知情同意流程,用于支持精准健康研究:大型、基于人群的队列实施和可扩展性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 8;23(12):e31121. doi: 10.2196/31121.
8
Communicating With Diverse Patients About Participating in a Biobank: A Randomized Multisite Study Comparing Electronic and Face-to-Face Informed Consent Processes.与不同患者沟通参与生物库研究:一项比较电子和面对面知情同意过程的随机多中心研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):144-166. doi: 10.1177/15562646211038819. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Electronic Video Consent to Power Precision Health Research: A Pilot Cohort Study.电子视频同意用于精准健康研究:一项试点队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 8;5(9):e29123. doi: 10.2196/29123.
10
Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.青少年对生物样本库的同意与重新同意:最新进展与新出现的伦理问题
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 9;8:686264. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.686264. eCollection 2021.
Genet Med. 2015 Mar;17(3):226-33. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.102. Epub 2014 Aug 21.
4
Public perspectives on biospecimen procurement: what biorepositories should consider.公众对生物样本采集的看法:生物样本库应考虑的因素
Biopreserv Biobank. 2013 Jun;11(3):137-43. doi: 10.1089/bio.2013.0001. Epub 2013 May 29.
5
Biobanking 3.0: evidence based and customer focused biobanking.生物银行 3.0:基于证据和以客户为中心的生物银行。
Clin Biochem. 2014 Mar;47(4-5):300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
6
A rural community's involvement in the design and usability testing of a computer-based informed consent process for the Personalized Medicine Research Project.一个农村社区参与个性化医学研究项目基于计算机的知情同意流程的设计和可用性测试。
Am J Med Genet A. 2014 Jan;164A(1):129-40. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36220. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
7
Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials.提高研究知情同意过程中的理解:54 项随机对照试验中测试的干预措施的系统评价。
BMC Med Ethics. 2013 Jul 23;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.
8
An investigation of the efficacy of electronic consenting interfaces of research permissions management system in a hospital setting.在医院环境中研究许可管理系统电子同意界面功效的调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Sep;82(9):854-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
9
Interactive informed consent: randomized comparison with paper consents.交互式知情同意:与纸质同意书的随机比较。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058603. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.个体基因组测序知情同意对相关知识的影响。
Clin Genet. 2012 Nov;82(5):408-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01909.x. Epub 2012 Aug 7.