Karanth Laxminarayan, Kanagasabai Sachchithanantham, Abas Adinegara B L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, Bukit Baru, Jalan Batu, Hampar, Melaka, Malaysia, 75150.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 3(4):CD011059. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011059.pub2.
Bleeding disorders are uncommon but may pose significant bleeding complications during pregnancy, labour and following delivery for both the woman and the foetus. While many bleeding disorders in women tend to improve in pregnancy, thus decreasing the haemorrhagic risk to the mother at the time of delivery, some do not correct or return quite quickly to their pre-pregnancy levels in the postpartum period. Therefore, specific measures to prevent maternal bleeding and foetal complications during childbirth, are required. The safest method of delivery to reduce morbidity and mortality in these women is controversial.
To assess the optimal mode of delivery in women with, or carriers of, bleeding disorders.
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Coagulopathies Trials Register, compiled from electronic database searches and handsearching of journals and conference abstract books. We also searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register as well as trials registries and the reference lists of relevant articles and reviews.Date of last search of the Group's Trials Registers: 13 January 2015.
Randomised controlled trials and all types of controlled clinical trials investigating the optimal mode of delivery in women with, or carriers of, any type of bleeding disorder during pregnancy were eligible for the review.
No trials matching the selection criteria were eligible for inclusion
No results from randomized controlled trials were found.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review did not identify any randomised controlled trials investigating the safest mode of delivery and associated maternal and foetal complications during delivery in women with, or carriers of, a bleeding disorder. In the absence of high quality evidence, clinicians need to use their clinical judgement and lower level evidence (e.g. from observational trials, case studies) to decide upon the optimal mode of delivery to ensure the safety of both mother and foetus.Given the ethical considerations, the rarity of the disorders and the low incidence of both maternal and foetal complications, future randomised controlled trials to find the optimal mode of delivery in this population are unlikely to be carried out. Other high quality controlled studies (such as risk allocation designs, sequential design, and parallel cohort design) are needed to investigate the risks and benefits of natural vaginal and caesarean section in this population or extrapolation from other clinical conditions that incur a haemorrhagic risk to the baby, such as platelet alloimmunisation.
出血性疾病并不常见,但在妊娠、分娩及产后可能给孕妇和胎儿带来严重的出血并发症。虽然许多女性的出血性疾病在孕期往往会有所改善,从而降低分娩时母亲的出血风险,但有些疾病在产后并不会得到纠正或很快恢复到孕前水平。因此,需要采取特定措施来预防分娩期间的母体出血和胎儿并发症。对于这些女性而言,最安全的分娩方式以降低发病率和死亡率存在争议。
评估患有出血性疾病或为出血性疾病携带者的女性的最佳分娩方式。
我们检索了Cochrane囊性纤维化和遗传性疾病凝血障碍试验注册库,该注册库通过电子数据库检索以及对期刊和会议摘要书籍的手工检索汇编而成。我们还检索了Cochrane妊娠和分娩组试验注册库以及试验注册机构,并查阅了相关文章和综述的参考文献列表。该组试验注册库的最后检索日期为2015年1月13日。
随机对照试验以及所有类型的对照临床试验,只要是研究孕期患有任何类型出血性疾病或为出血性疾病携带者的女性的最佳分娩方式,均符合纳入本综述的条件。
没有符合选择标准的试验可纳入本综述。
未找到随机对照试验的结果。
本综述未发现任何关于患有出血性疾病或为出血性疾病携带者的女性最安全的分娩方式以及分娩期间相关母体和胎儿并发症的随机对照试验。在缺乏高质量证据的情况下,临床医生需要运用临床判断力和较低水平的证据(如来自观察性试验、病例研究)来决定最佳分娩方式,以确保母婴安全。鉴于伦理考量、疾病的罕见性以及母婴并发症的低发生率,未来不太可能开展旨在找出该人群最佳分娩方式的随机对照试验。需要其他高质量的对照研究(如风险分配设计、序贯设计和平行队列设计)来研究自然阴道分娩和剖宫产在该人群中的风险和益处,或者从其他对婴儿有出血风险的临床情况进行推断,如血小板同种免疫。