Cochrane D J, Cronin M J, Fink P W
School of Sport & Exericse, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Int J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;36(9):716-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547222. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of vibration warm-up to enhance sprint performance. 12 males involved in representative team sports performed 4 warm-up conditions in a randomised order performed at least 24 h apart; VbX warm-up (VbX-WU); Neural activation warm-up (Neu-WU); Dynamic warm-up (Dyn-WU) and Control (No VbX). Participants completed 5 m sprint at 30 s, 2:30 min and 5 min post warm-up where sprint time, kinetics, and temporal components were recorded. There was no significant (p>0.05) main effect or interaction effect between the split sprint times of 1 m, 2.5 m, and 5 m. There was a condition effect where vertical mean force was significantly higher (p<0.05) in Dyn-WU and Control compared to Neu-WU. No other significant (p>0.05) main and interaction effects in sprint kinetic and temporal parameters existed. Overall, all 4 warm-up conditions produced comparable results for sprint performance, and there was no detrimental effect on short-duration sprint performance using VbX-WU. Therefore, VbX could be useful for adding variety to the training warm-up or be included into the main warm-up routine as a supplementary modality.
本研究旨在探讨振动热身对提高短跑成绩的效果。12名参加代表性团队运动的男性以随机顺序进行了4种热身条件，每次间隔至少24小时；VbX热身（VbX-WU）；神经激活热身（Neu-WU）；动态热身（Dyn-WU）和对照组（无VbX）。参与者在热身结束后30秒、2分30秒和5分钟时完成5米短跑，记录短跑时间、动力学和时间成分。1米、2.5米和5米分段短跑时间之间没有显著（p>0.05）的主效应或交互效应。存在条件效应，与Neu-WU相比，Dyn-WU和对照组的垂直平均力显著更高（p<0.05）。在短跑动力学和时间参数方面不存在其他显著（p>0.05）的主效应和交互效应。总体而言，所有4种热身条件对短跑成绩产生了可比的结果，并且使用VbX-WU对短时间短跑成绩没有不利影响。因此，VbX可用于增加训练热身的多样性，或作为一种补充方式纳入主要热身程序。
