Cho Won-Sang, Hong Hyun Sook, Kang Hyun-Seung, Kim Jeong Eun, Cho Young Dae, Kwon O-Ki, Bang Jae Seung, Hwang Gyojun, Son Young Je, Oh Chang Wan, Han Moon Hee
*Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; ‡Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; §Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Neurosurgery. 2015 Aug;77(2):208-16; discussion 216-7. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000759.
The availability of stents has widened the indications of endovascular intervention for cerebral aneurysms.
To elucidate the effect of stents on radiologic outcomes and to analyze the risk factors for aneurysmal recanalization via propensity score matching.
From the 735 aneurysms treated with coil embolization with stents (n = 187) and without stents (n = 548) between 2009 and 2011, 157 propensity score-matched case pairs were selected. The recanalization rates and relevant risk factors were analyzed. The mean follow-up interval was 24.1 ± 11.3 months (range, 6-48 months) and 22.9 ± 11.4 months (range, 6-56 months) in the stent and nonstent groups, respectively (P = .388).
The stent group demonstrated lower recanalization rates than the nonstent group during both the 6-month (1.9% vs 10.2%, P = .004) and the final follow-up periods (8.3% vs 18.5%, P = .005). The multivariate analysis identified the following significant factors for recanalization: the use of stents (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.76, P = .005), larger aneurysm size (hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.31, P < .001), and initially incomplete occlusion (hazard ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-4.43, P = .006). The incidence of permanent neurological complication tended to be higher in the stent group than in the nonstent group (3.2% vs 0%, P = .063).
In this propensity score-matched analysis, stent implantation reduced the overall recanalization of the coiled cerebral aneurysms. However, the use of stents should be carefully decided upon.
支架的应用拓宽了脑动脉瘤血管内介入治疗的适应证。
通过倾向评分匹配阐明支架对影像学结果的影响,并分析动脉瘤再通的危险因素。
从2009年至2011年接受弹簧圈栓塞治疗的735例动脉瘤患者中,选择了157对倾向评分匹配的病例对,其中使用支架的有187例,未使用支架的有548例。分析再通率及相关危险因素。支架组和非支架组的平均随访时间分别为24.1±11.3个月(范围6 - 48个月)和22.9±11.4个月(范围6 - 56个月)(P = 0.388)。
在6个月时(1.9%对10.2%,P = 0.004)和最终随访期(8.3%对18.5%,P = 0.005),支架组的再通率均低于非支架组。多因素分析确定了以下再通的显著因素:使用支架(风险比,0.40;95%置信区间,0.21 - 0.76,P = 0.005)、动脉瘤较大(风险比,1.21;95%置信区间,1.11 - 1.31,P < 0.001)以及初始栓塞不完全(风险比,2.39;95%置信区间,1.28 - 4.43,P = 0.006)。支架组永久性神经并发症的发生率倾向于高于非支架组(3.2%对0%,P = 0.063)。
在这项倾向评分匹配分析中,支架植入降低了弹簧圈栓塞脑动脉瘤的总体再通率。然而,支架的使用应谨慎决定。