Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University and Graduate School of Gangwon University, Chuncheon, Korea.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Oct;32(9):1707-10. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2592. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
Stents are known to have hemodynamic and biologic effects in addition to their mechanical scaffold effect. To determine whether stents affect long-term outcomes after coiling of unruptured aneurysms, we compared angiographic outcomes at 2 years postembolization for stent- and nonstent-assisted coiled unruptured aneurysms.
Stent-assisted coiling was used in unruptured aneurysms unfavorable for simple coiling (neck size >4 mm and dome-to-neck ratio <1.5) in our practice. Therefore, 126 coiled unruptured aneurysms in total (40 [31.7%] stent group and 86 [68.3%] nonstent group) with these conditions were selected for this study. The nonstent group aneurysms were treated with multiple microcatheter technique (53 cases) or balloon-assisted technique (33 cases). Self-expandable stents were used for coiling in stent group aneurysms. No significant difference in aneurysmal characteristics (aneurysm type [sidewall/bifurcation], diameter, neck size, and dome-to-neck ratio) or angiographic outcome at embolization (packing attenuation, obliteration grade, and contrast filling) were observed between the 2 study groups.
At 2-year follow-up visits, rates of progressive occlusion (stent group, 17/40 [42.5%] versus nonstent group, 34/86 [39.5%]) and recanalization (7/40 [17.5%] versus 18/86 [21.0%]) did not show a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .895).
The present study did not show that additional hemodynamic and biologic effects of stents designed for neck remodeling were enough to enhance progressive occlusion and prevent the recanalization of unruptured aneurysms. Our finding suggests that stent placement provides no better long-term angiographic outcomes for unruptured aneurysms with an unfavorable configuration for coiling.
支架除了具有机械支架作用外,还具有血液动力学和生物学效应。为了确定支架是否会影响未破裂动脉瘤线圈栓塞后的长期结果,我们比较了支架辅助和非支架辅助线圈栓塞未破裂动脉瘤 2 年后的血管造影结果。
在我们的实践中,支架辅助线圈用于不利于单纯线圈栓塞的未破裂动脉瘤(颈部尺寸>4mm 且瘤颈比<1.5)。因此,共选择了 126 个具有这些条件的未破裂动脉瘤(支架组 40 个[31.7%],非支架组 86 个[68.3%])进行本研究。非支架组动脉瘤采用多微导管技术(53 例)或球囊辅助技术(33 例)治疗。支架组动脉瘤采用自膨式支架进行线圈栓塞。两组患者的动脉瘤特征(动脉瘤类型[侧壁/分叉]、直径、颈部尺寸和瘤颈比)或栓塞时的血管造影结果(填塞衰减、闭塞等级和对比充盈)均无显著差异。
在 2 年的随访中,进展性闭塞(支架组 17/40 [42.5%] vs 非支架组 34/86 [39.5%])和再通(支架组 7/40 [17.5%] vs 非支架组 18/86 [21.0%])的发生率在两组间无统计学差异(P=0.895)。
本研究表明,支架的设计旨在重塑颈部,增加的血液动力学和生物学效应不足以增强未破裂动脉瘤的渐进性闭塞和防止再通。我们的研究结果表明,对于形状不利于线圈栓塞的未破裂动脉瘤,支架置入并不能提供更好的长期血管造影结果。