Rosell Julieta A, Castorena Matiss, Laws Claire A, Westoby Mark
Departamento de Ecología de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, México DF, Mexico,
Oecologia. 2015 Aug;178(4):1033-43. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3307-5. Epub 2015 Apr 5.
Although produced by meristems that are continuous along the stem length, marked differences in bark morphology and in microenvironment would suggest that main stem and twig bark might differ ecologically. Here, we examined: (1) how closely associated main stem and twig bark traits were, (2) how these associations varied across sites, and (3) used these associations to infer functional and ecological differences between twig and main stem bark. We measured density, water content, photosynthesis presence/absence, total, outer, inner, and relative thicknesses of main stem and twig bark from 85 species of angiosperms from six sites of contrasting precipitation, temperature, and fire regimes. Density and water content did not differ between main stems and twigs across species and sites. Species with thicker twig bark had disproportionately thicker main stem bark in most sites, but the slope and degree of association varied. Disproportionately thicker main stem bark for a given twig bark thickness in most fire-prone sites suggested stem protection near the ground. The savanna had the opposite trend, suggesting that selection also favors twig protection in these fire-prone habitats. A weak main stem-twig bark thickness association was observed in non fire-prone sites. The near-ubiquity of photosynthesis in twigs highlighted its likely ecological importance; variation in this activity was predicted by outer bark thickness in main stems. It seems that the ecology of twig bark can be generalized to main stem bark, but not for functions depending on the amount of bark, such as protection, storage, or photosynthesis.
尽管由沿茎干长度连续的分生组织产生,但树皮形态和微环境的显著差异表明,主茎和小枝的树皮在生态方面可能存在差异。在此,我们研究了:(1)主茎和小枝树皮特征的关联程度有多紧密,(2)这些关联在不同地点如何变化,以及(3)利用这些关联推断小枝和主茎树皮之间的功能和生态差异。我们测量了来自六个降水、温度和火灾状况不同的地点的85种被子植物的主茎和小枝树皮的密度、含水量、是否存在光合作用、总厚度、外层厚度、内层厚度以及相对厚度。在不同物种和地点,主茎和小枝的密度和含水量没有差异。在大多数地点,小枝树皮较厚的物种,其主茎树皮也不成比例地更厚,但关联的斜率和程度有所不同。在大多数易发生火灾的地点,对于给定的小枝树皮厚度,主茎树皮不成比例地更厚,这表明靠近地面的茎干受到保护。稀树草原呈现相反的趋势,这表明在这些易发生火灾的栖息地,选择也有利于保护小枝。在不易发生火灾的地点,观察到主茎 - 小枝树皮厚度的关联较弱。小枝中光合作用几乎无处不在,这突出了其可能的生态重要性;主茎外层树皮厚度可预测这种活动的变化。似乎小枝树皮的生态特征可以推广到主茎树皮,但对于依赖树皮量的功能,如保护、储存或光合作用,则不能推广。