• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The predictive performance of infusion strategy nomogram based on a fluid kinetic model.基于流体动力学模型的输液策略列线图的预测性能。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):128-35. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.128. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
2
Hypertonic-hyperoncotic solutions improve cardiac function in children after open-heart surgery.高渗高渗胶体溶液可改善儿童心脏直视手术后的心脏功能。
Pediatrics. 2006 Jul;118(1):e76-84. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2795. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
3
Comparison between two phenylephrine infusion rates with moderate co-loading for the prevention of spinal anaeshtesia-induced hypotension during elective caesarean section.在择期剖宫产术中,比较两种苯肾上腺素输注速率联合适度预负荷用于预防脊麻引起的低血压的效果。
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2011 Oct;21(3):361-6.
4
Maternal cardiac output changes after crystalloid or colloid coload following spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.产妇在择期剖宫产行脊麻后晶胶预扩容后心输出量的变化:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):803-10. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822c0f08. Epub 2011 Sep 2.
5
Effects of anesthesia on fluid volume kinetics after infusion of colloid solution during blood donation.输注胶体溶液后献血时麻醉对液体容量动力学的影响。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010 Jun;58(6):514-20. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2010.58.6.514. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
6
Changing the priming solution from Ringer's to Hartmann's solution is associated with less metabolic acidosis during cardiopulmonary bypass.在体外循环期间,将预充溶液从林格氏液改为哈特曼氏液与较少的代谢性酸中毒相关。
Perfusion. 2007 Nov;22(6):385-9. doi: 10.1177/0267659108089142.
7
The effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on cardiac output in the parturient undergoing planned cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized trial.晶体液和胶体液预负荷对脊髓麻醉下择期剖宫产产妇心输出量的影响:一项随机试验
Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1916-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbfdf6.
8
Effect of administration of pre-warmed intravenous fluids on the frequency of hypothermia following spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery.剖宫产脊髓麻醉后给予预温静脉输液对体温过低发生率的影响。
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Jun;21(4):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
9
Intra- and extravascular volume status in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement: crystalloid vs. colloid priming of cardiopulmonary bypass.二尖瓣置换术患者的血管内和血管外容量状态:体外循环晶体预充液与胶体预充液的比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jan;23(1):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021505001687.
10
Validation of volume kinetic analysis of glucose 2.5% solution given by intravenous infusion.
Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):600-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg102.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding Volume Kinetics: The Role of Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Analysis in Fluid Therapy.理解容量动力学:药代动力学建模与分析在液体治疗中的作用。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Nov 20;7:587106. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.587106. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
The comparison of predictive performance in bispectral index prediction during target effect-site controlled infusion of propofol using different blood effect-site equilibration rate constants in the same pharmacokinetic model.同一药代动力学模型中不同血药-效应室平衡速率常数用于目标效应室靶控输注丙泊酚时脑电双频指数预测性能的比较。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Oct;65(4):299-305. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.4.299. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
2
Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.stroke volume variation 预测液体反应性的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):904-16. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1217-1. Epub 2011 Sep 4.
3
External validation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of microemulsion and long-chain triglyceride emulsion propofol in beagle dogs.
微乳剂和长链甘油三酯乳剂丙泊酚在比格犬体内药代动力学和药效学模型的外部验证
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;35(4):329-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2011.01321.x. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?脉压变异:我们今天在哪里?
J Clin Monit Comput. 2011 Feb;25(1):45-56. doi: 10.1007/s10877-010-9229-1.
5
Evaluation of the predictive performance of four pharmacokinetic models for propofol.四种丙泊酚药代动力学模型预测性能的评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2009 May;102(5):626-32. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep043. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
6
A rational approach to perioperative fluid management.围手术期液体管理的合理方法。
Anesthesiology. 2008 Oct;109(4):723-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181863117.
7
[Target-controlled infusion (TCI) - a concept with a future?: state-of-the-art, treatment recommendations and a look into the future].[靶控输注(TCI)——一个具有未来前景的概念?:最新技术水平、治疗建议及未来展望]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Mar;57(3):223-30. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1329-7.
8
Volume expansion and plasma protein clearance during intravenous infusion of 5% albumin and autologous plasma.静脉输注5%白蛋白和自体血浆期间的容量扩张及血浆蛋白清除率
Clin Sci (Lond). 2005 Mar;108(3):217-24. doi: 10.1042/CS20040303.
9
The use of volume kinetics to optimize fluid therapy.运用容量动力学优化液体治疗。
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5 Suppl):S155-8. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000064515.51896.DE.
10
Volume kinetic analysis of the distribution of 0.9% saline in conscious versus isoflurane-anesthetized sheep.清醒与异氟烷麻醉绵羊体内0.9%生理盐水分布的容量动力学分析。
Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):442-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00033.

基于流体动力学模型的输液策略列线图的预测性能。

The predictive performance of infusion strategy nomogram based on a fluid kinetic model.

作者信息

Choi Byung Moon, Karm Myung Hwan, Jung Kyeo Woon, Yeo Young Goo, Choi Kyu Taek

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Korea.

The College of Engineering Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr;68(2):128-35. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.128. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

DOI:10.4097/kjae.2015.68.2.128
PMID:25844130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4384399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, fluid kinetic models were applied to describe the volume expansion of the fluid space by administration of crystalloid and colloid solutions. However, validation of the models were not performed, it is necessary to evaluate the predictive performance of these models in another population.

METHODS

Ninety five consenting patients undergoing elective spinal surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study. These patients were randomly assigned to three fluid groups i.e. Hartmann's solution (H group, n = 28), Voluven® (V group, n = 34), and Hextend® (X group, n = 33). After completion of their preparation for surgery, the patients received a loading and maintenance volume of each fluid predetermined by nomograms based on fluid pharmacokinetic models during the 60-minute use of an infusion pump. Arterial samples were obtained at preset intervals of 0, 10, 20, and 30 min after fluid administration. The predictive performances of the fluid kinetic modes were evaluated using the fractional change of arterial hemoglobin. The relationship between blood-volume dilution and target dilution of body fluid space was also evaluated using regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 194 hemoglobin measurements were used. The bias and inaccuracy of these models were -2.69 and 35.62 for the H group, -1.53 and 43.21 for the V group, and 9.05 and 41.82 for the X group, respectively. The blood-volume dilution and target dilution of body-fluid space showed a significant linear relationship in each group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the inaccuracy of predictive performance, the fluid-kinetic model for Hartmann's solution showed better performance than the other models.

摘要

背景

在先前的一项研究中,流体动力学模型被用于描述通过输注晶体液和胶体液引起的液体空间容积扩张。然而,这些模型尚未得到验证,有必要在另一人群中评估这些模型的预测性能。

方法

本研究纳入了95例在全身麻醉下接受择期脊柱手术且表示同意的患者。这些患者被随机分为三组液体组,即哈特曼氏溶液组(H组,n = 28)、万汶组(V组,n = 34)和贺斯组(X组,n = 33)。在完成手术准备后,患者在使用输液泵的60分钟内接受根据基于流体药代动力学模型的列线图预先确定的每种液体的负荷量和维持量。在给予液体后的0、10、20和30分钟的预设时间间隔采集动脉血样。使用动脉血红蛋白的分数变化评估流体动力学模型的预测性能。还使用回归分析评估血容量稀释与体液空间目标稀释之间的关系。

结果

总共进行了194次血红蛋白测量。这些模型的偏差和不准确度在H组分别为-2.69和35.62,在V组分别为-1.53和43.21,在X组分别为9.05和41.82。每组血容量稀释与体液空间目标稀释均呈显著线性关系(P < 0.05)。

结论

基于预测性能的不准确度,哈特曼氏溶液的流体动力学模型表现优于其他模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/8c2db8eaa59b/kjae-68-128-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/2bc3cd236faa/kjae-68-128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/564b98c40fcd/kjae-68-128-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/4c28ad5ee862/kjae-68-128-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/324fe54a8fd1/kjae-68-128-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/8c2db8eaa59b/kjae-68-128-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/2bc3cd236faa/kjae-68-128-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/564b98c40fcd/kjae-68-128-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/4c28ad5ee862/kjae-68-128-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/324fe54a8fd1/kjae-68-128-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2105/4384399/8c2db8eaa59b/kjae-68-128-g005.jpg