Bass Stephanie N, Bauer Seth R, Neuner Elizabeth A, Lam Simon W
Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Department of Pharmacy, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Jul;59(7):3748-53. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00091-15. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
There are limited treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections. Currently, there are suggestions in the literature that combination therapy should be used, which frequently includes antibiotics to which the causative pathogen demonstrates in vitro resistance. This case-control study evaluated risk factors associated with all-cause mortality rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. Adult patients who were admitted to an intensive care unit with sepsis and a blood culture positive for Gram-negative bacteria resistant to a carbapenem were included. Patients with polymicrobial, recurrent, or breakthrough infections were excluded. Included patients were classified as survivors (controls) or nonsurvivors (cases) at 30 days after the positive blood culture. Of 302 patients screened, 168 patients were included, of whom 90 patients died (53.6% [cases]) and 78 survived (46.4% [controls]) at 30 days. More survivors received appropriate antibiotics (antibiotics with in vitro activity) than did nonsurvivors (93.6% versus 53.3%; P < 0.01). Combination therapy, defined as multiple appropriate agents given for 48 h or more, was more common among survivors than nonsurvivors (32.1% versus 7.8%; P < 0.01); however, there was no difference in multiple-agent use when in vitro activity was not considered (including combinations with carbapenems) (87.2% versus 80%; P = 0.21). After adjustment for baseline factors with multivariable logistic regression, combination therapy was independently associated with decreased risk of death (odds ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.56]; P < 0.01). These data suggest that combination therapy with multiple agents with in vitro activity is associated with improved survival rates for critically ill patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteremia. However, that association is lost if in vitro activity is not considered.
对于耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌感染,治疗选择有限。目前,文献中有建议应采用联合治疗,其中常常包括致病病原体对其显示出体外耐药性的抗生素。这项病例对照研究评估了耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌血症重症患者全因死亡率的相关危险因素。纳入了入住重症监护病房、患有脓毒症且血培养革兰氏阴性菌对碳青霉烯类耐药呈阳性的成年患者。排除患有多种微生物感染、复发性感染或突破性感染的患者。纳入的患者在血培养阳性后30天被分类为幸存者(对照组)或非幸存者(病例组)。在筛查的302例患者中,168例被纳入,其中90例患者在30天时死亡(53.6%[病例组]),78例存活(46.4%[对照组])。与非幸存者相比,更多的幸存者接受了合适的抗生素(具有体外活性的抗生素)(93.6%对53.3%;P<0.01)。联合治疗定义为给予多种合适药物48小时或更长时间,在幸存者中比非幸存者更常见(32.1%对7.8%;P<0.01);然而,在不考虑体外活性时(包括与碳青霉烯类联合使用),多药使用情况没有差异(87.2%对80%;P = 0.21)。通过多变量逻辑回归对基线因素进行调整后,联合治疗与死亡风险降低独立相关(比值比,0.19[95%置信区间,0.06至0.56];P<0.01)。这些数据表明,使用具有体外活性的多种药物进行联合治疗与耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌血症重症患者的生存率提高相关。然而,如果不考虑体外活性,这种关联就不存在了。