Sharp Daniel, Millum Joseph
Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Jun;92(6):1087-9. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0087. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
Non-communicable diseases now account for the majority of the global burden of disease and an international campaign has emerged to raise their priority on the post-2015 development agenda. We argue, to the contrary, that there remain strong reasons to prioritize maternal and child health. Policy-makers ought to assign highest priority to the health conditions that afflict the worst off. In virtue of how little healthy life they have had, children who die young are among the globally worst off. Moreover, many interventions to deal with the conditions that cause mortality in the young are low-cost and provide great benefits to their recipients. Consistent with the original Millennium Development Goals, the international community should continue to prioritize reductions in communicable diseases, neonatal conditions, and maternal health despite the shifts in the global burden of disease.
非传染性疾病如今占全球疾病负担的大部分,一场国际运动已经兴起,以提高其在2015年后发展议程中的优先地位。相反,我们认为,仍有充分理由将孕产妇和儿童健康作为优先事项。政策制定者应该将最高优先级赋予那些折磨最贫困人群的健康状况。鉴于他们拥有的健康生命如此之少,夭折的儿童属于全球最贫困人群。此外,许多应对导致年轻人死亡的疾病的干预措施成本低廉,且能为接受者带来巨大益处。与最初的千年发展目标一致,尽管全球疾病负担有所变化,国际社会仍应继续将减少传染病、新生儿疾病和孕产妇健康问题作为优先事项。