Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Science, Branisovska 31, 370 05, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Vinicna 7, 128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jul;23(14):13653-60. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4382-1. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Recently, fly ash deposits have been revealed as a secondary refuge of critically endangered arthropods specialised on aeolian sands in Central Europe. Simultaneously, these anthropogenic habitats are well known for their negative impact on human health and the surrounding environment. The overwhelming majority of these risks are caused by wind erosion, the substantial decreasing of which is thus necessary. But, any effects of anti-dust treatments on endangered arthropods have never been studied. We surveyed communities of five arthropod groups (wild bees and wasps, leafhoppers, spiders, hoverflies and orthopteroid insects) colonising three fly ash deposits in the western Czech Republic. We focused on two different anti-dust treatments (~70 and 100 % cover of fly ash by barren soil) and their comparison with a control of bare fly ash. Altogether, we recorded 495 species, including 132 nationally threatened species (eight of them were considered to be extinct in the country) and/or 30 species strictly specialised to drift sands. Bees and wasps and leafhoppers contained the overwhelming majority of species of the highest conservation interest; a few other important records were also in spiders and orthopteroids. Total soil cover depleted the unique environment of fly ash and thus destroyed the high conservation potential of the deposits. On the other hand, partial coverage (with ~30 % of bare fly ash) still offered habitats for many of the most threatened species, as we showed by both regression and multivariate analyses, with a decrease of wind erosion. This topic still needs much more research interest, but we consider mosaic-like preservation of smaller spots of fly ash as one of the possible compromises between biodiversity and human health.
最近,飞灰沉积物已被揭示为中欧专门在风成沙上的濒危节肢动物的次要避难所。同时,这些人为栖息地也因对人类健康和周围环境的负面影响而广为人知。这些风险中的绝大多数是由风蚀引起的,因此必须大量减少风蚀。但是,从未研究过防尘处理对濒危节肢动物的任何影响。我们调查了五个节肢动物群(野生蜜蜂和黄蜂,叶蝉,蜘蛛,蝇类和直翅目昆虫)在捷克共和国西部的三个飞灰沉积物中定殖的群落。我们专注于两种不同的防尘处理(飞灰的无土覆盖面积约为 70%和 100%)及其与裸露飞灰对照的比较。总共记录了 495 种物种,其中包括 132 种受到国家威胁的物种(其中有 8 种被认为在该国已经灭绝)和/或 30 种严格专门针对漂流沙的物种。蜜蜂和黄蜂以及叶蝉包含绝大多数具有最高保护意义的物种;蜘蛛和直翅目昆虫中也有其他一些重要的记录。总的土壤覆盖减少了飞灰的独特环境,从而破坏了沉积物的高保护潜力。另一方面,部分覆盖(约 30%的裸露飞灰)仍然为许多受威胁最大的物种提供了栖息地,正如我们通过回归和多元分析所表明的那样,随着风蚀的减少。这个主题仍然需要更多的研究兴趣,但我们认为,较小的飞灰斑点的马赛克式保护是生物多样性和人类健康之间的一种可能妥协。