Kouassi Kafui, Fétéké Lochina, Assignon Selom, Dorkenoo Ameyo, Napo-Koura Gado
Unité de biochimie, Unité de pilotage qualité du service des laboratoires du CHU, Ecole supérieure des techniques biologiques et alimentaires, Université de Lomé, Togo.
Département de biochimie, Faculté des sciences de la santé, Université de Lomé, Togo.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2015 Mar-Apr;73(2):165-75. doi: 10.1684/abc.2015.1026.
This study aims to evaluate the performance of a few biochemistry analysis and make recommendations to the place of the stakeholders. It is a cross-sectional study conducted between the October 1(st), 2012 and the July 31, 2013 bearing on the results of 5 common examinations of clinical biochemistry, provided by 11 laboratories volunteers opening in the public and private sectors. These laboratories have analysed during the 3 cycles, 2 levels (medium and high) of serum concentration of urea, glucose, creatinine and serum aminotransferases. The performance of laboratories have been determined from the acceptable limits corresponding to the limits of total errors, defined by the French Society of Clinical Biology (SFBC). A system of internal quality control is implemented by all laboratories and 45% of them participated in international programs of external quality assessment (EQA). The rate of acceptable results for the entire study was of 69%. There was a significant difference (p<0.002) between the performance of the group of laboratories engaged in a quality approach and the group with default implementation of the quality approach. Also a significant difference was observed between the laboratories of the central level and those of the peripheral level of our health system (p<0.047). The performance of the results provided by the laboratories remains relatively unsatisfactory. It is important that the Ministry of Health put in place a national program of EQA with mandatory participation.
