Suppr超能文献

显微外科耳部再植术——静脉修复是否必要?——一项系统评价

Microsurgical ear replantation-is venous repair necessary?-A systematic review.

作者信息

Momeni Arash, Liu Xiangxia, Januszyk Michael, Wan Derrick C, Buncke Gregory M, Buntic Rudolf F, Parrett Brian M

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA.

California Pacific Medical Center, The Buncke Clinic, Division of Microsurgery, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Microsurgery. 2016 May;36(4):345-50. doi: 10.1002/micr.22411. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A common postoperative observation after microsurgical ear replantation has been venous congestion necessitating alternate modes of decongestion, frequently in conjunction with blood transfusion. A comprehensive literature search was performed to assess the relationship between mode of vascular reconstruction and postoperative outcome as well as postoperative transfusion requirement after microsurgical ear replantation.

METHODS

The search was limited to cases of microsurgical ear replantation following complete amputation. Only articles published in English and indexed in PubMed were included.

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 285 articles, which was narrowed down to 40 articles reporting on 60 cases that matched the aforementioned criteria. Reconstruction of the arterial and venous limb (Group 1) was performed in 63.3% of patients and artery-only anastomosis (Group 2) was performed in 31.7%. Among measurable outcomes, only the duration of surgery was significantly different between groups (2.6 hours longer in Group 1 than Group 2; P = 0.0042).

CONCLUSION

In light of contemporary data demonstrating successful artery-only ear replantation, replantation should not be abandoned when unable to establish venous outflow microsurgically. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:345-350, 2016.

摘要

背景

显微外科耳再植术后常见的观察结果是静脉充血,这需要采用其他方式进行充血缓解,通常还需要输血。进行了全面的文献检索,以评估血管重建方式与术后结果以及显微外科耳再植术后输血需求之间的关系。

方法

检索仅限于完全离断后显微外科耳再植的病例。仅纳入发表于英文且被PubMed索引的文章。

结果

初步检索获得285篇文章,经筛选后缩小至40篇报道60例符合上述标准病例的文章。63.3%的患者采用动静脉端端吻合重建(第1组),31.7%的患者仅进行动脉吻合(第2组)。在可测量的结果中,仅两组间手术时长存在显著差异(第1组比第2组长2.6小时;P = 0.0042)。

结论

鉴于当代数据表明单纯动脉耳再植成功,当无法通过显微外科建立静脉流出道时,不应放弃再植。© 2015威利期刊公司。《显微外科》2016年第36卷:345 - 350页。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验