Zheng Jiakun, An Ruopeng
School of Sport Leisure, Recreation and Arts, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, PR China.
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Jan-Mar;15(1):2990. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
Rural-urban inequalities in China have been widening over the past few decades. Compared to their urban counterparts, rural residents may encounter various barriers to equal opportunities to effectively engage in physical activity. This study examines the rural-urban disparity in physical activity, proximity and satisfaction with local exercise facilities.
An in-person survey was conducted in 29 counties of 10 Chinese provinces in 2012. Five thousand questionnaires were administered by trained staff with a completion rate of 82.1%. The complete sample includes 1661 rural and 2446 urban residents. Eight dichotomous outcome measures were used, pertaining to leisure-time physical activity engagement; proximity to the nearest exercise facility from home; satisfaction level with the quantity, variety, fee levels, opening hours, and daily management and services of nearby exercise facilities; and satisfaction level with the local public sports service system. Nearest-neighbor matching was performed to match rural residents with urban residents by observed individual sociodemographics, including gender, age, education level and residential province. Pearson's χ2 test was used to assess the difference in sociodemographics and outcome measures between rural and urban residents before and after matching.
Before nearest-neighbor matching, the frequency distributions of age and education level are significantly different between rural and urban residents (both p<0.0001). After matching, the differences in the frequency distributions between rural and urban residents become statistically non-significant for all observed sociodemographics: gender (p=0.170), age (p=0.934), education level (p=0.244) and residential province (p=1.000). Compared to their matched urban counterparts, rural residents are 8.1% (p<0.0001) more likely to be physically inactive in their leisure time and 5.8% (p=0.005) less likely to live within 30-minute walking distance to the nearest exercise facility. Rural residents are 15.7%, 15.7%, 8.6%, 13.5% and 14.7% more likely to be unsatisfied with the quantity, variety, fee levels, opening hours, and daily management and services of nearby exercise facilities, and 16.1% more likely to be unsatisfied with the local public sports service system than matched urban residents (all p<0.0001).
Substantial rural-urban disparities tend to be present in leisure-time physical activity, proximity to the nearest exercise facility, and satisfaction level with exercise facilities and the public sports service system. Policy interventions are warranted to improve the accessibility and affordability of local exercise facilities in rural areas as a way to promote physical activity among Chinese rural residents and reduce disparities.
在过去几十年中,中国城乡不平等现象一直在加剧。与城市居民相比,农村居民在有效参与体育活动的平等机会方面可能会遇到各种障碍。本研究调查了体育活动、到当地健身设施的距离以及对这些设施的满意度方面的城乡差异。
2012年在中国10个省份的29个县进行了实地调查。由经过培训的工作人员发放了5000份问卷,完成率为82.1%。完整样本包括1661名农村居民和2446名城市居民。使用了八项二分结果指标,涉及休闲体育活动参与情况;从家到最近健身设施的距离;对附近健身设施的数量、种类、收费水平、开放时间以及日常管理和服务的满意度;以及对当地公共体育服务体系的满意度。通过观察个体社会人口统计学特征(包括性别、年龄、教育水平和居住省份)对农村居民与城市居民进行最近邻匹配。使用Pearson卡方检验评估匹配前后农村和城市居民在社会人口统计学和结果指标方面的差异。
在最近邻匹配之前,农村和城市居民的年龄和教育水平频率分布存在显著差异(均p<0.0001)。匹配后,对于所有观察到的社会人口统计学特征,农村和城市居民之间的频率分布差异在统计学上变得不显著:性别(p=0.170)、年龄(p=0.934)、教育水平(p=0.244)和居住省份(p=1.000)。与匹配的城市居民相比,农村居民在休闲时间不进行体育活动的可能性高8.1%(p<0.0001),居住在距离最近健身设施步行30分钟以内的可能性低5.8%(p=0.005)。农村居民对附近健身设施的数量、种类、收费水平、开放时间以及日常管理和服务不满意的可能性比匹配的城市居民分别高15.7%、15.7%、8.6%、13.5%和14.7%,对当地公共体育服务体系不满意的可能性高16.1%(均p<0.0001)。
在休闲体育活动、到最近健身设施的距离以及对健身设施和公共体育服务体系的满意度方面,城乡之间存在显著差异。有必要采取政策干预措施,提高农村地区当地健身设施的可及性和可承受性,以此促进中国农村居民的体育活动并减少差距。