Artino Anthony R, Dong Ting, Cruess David F, Gilliland William R, Durning Steven J
Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.
Mil Med. 2015 Apr;180(4 Suppl):104-8. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00554.
Using a previously developed postgraduate year (PGY)-1 program director's evaluation survey, we developed a parallel form to assess more senior residents (PGY-3). The PGY-3 survey, which aligns with the core competencies established by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, also includes items that reflect our institution's military-unique context.
To collect feasibility, reliability, and validity evidence for the new PGY-3 evaluation.
We collected PGY-3 data from program directors who oversee the education of military residents. The current study's cohort consisted of Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences students graduating in 2008, 2009, and 2010. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to examine the internal structure of the survey and subjected each of the factors identified in the EFA to an internal consistency reliability analysis. We then performed correlation analysis to examine the relationships between PGY-3 ratings and several
PGY-1 ratings, cumulative medical school grade point average (GPA), and performance on U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE) Step 1, Step 2 Clinical Knowledge, and Step 3.
Of the 510 surveys we distributed, 388 (76%) were returned. Results from the EFA suggested four factors: "Medical Expertise," "Professionalism," "Military-unique Practice," and "Systems-based Practice." Scores on these four factors showed good internal consistency reliability, as measured by Cronbach's α (α ranged from 0.92 to 0.98). Further, as expected, "Medical Expertise" and "Professionalism" had small to moderate correlations with cumulative medical school GPA and performance on the USMLE Step examinations.
The new program director's evaluation survey instrument developed in this study appears to be feasible, and the scores that emerged have reasonable evidence of reliability and validity in a sample of third-year residents.
我们使用先前开发的研究生一年级(PGY-1)项目主任评估调查问卷,设计了一个平行版本,用于评估更高年级的住院医师(PGY-3)。PGY-3调查问卷与毕业后医学教育认证委员会制定的核心能力标准相一致,还包含反映我们机构军队特色背景的项目。
收集新的PGY-3评估的可行性、可靠性和有效性证据。
我们从负责军队住院医师教育的项目主任那里收集了PGY-3的数据。本研究的队列包括2008年、2009年和2010年毕业于健康科学统一服务大学的学生。我们进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)以检验调查问卷的内部结构,并对EFA中确定的每个因素进行内部一致性可靠性分析。然后我们进行相关性分析,以检验PGY-3评分与几个结果之间的关系:PGY-1评分、医学院累积平均绩点(GPA)以及美国医师执照考试(USMLE)第一步、第二步临床知识和第三步的成绩。
在我们分发的510份调查问卷中,388份(76%)被收回。EFA的结果表明有四个因素:“医学专业知识”、“职业素养”、“军队特色实践”和“基于系统的实践”。这四个因素的得分显示出良好的内部一致性可靠性,用克朗巴哈α系数衡量(α范围从0.92到0.98)。此外,正如预期的那样,“医学专业知识”和“职业素养”与医学院累积GPA以及USMLE各步考试成绩之间存在小到中等程度的相关性。
本研究中开发的新的项目主任评估调查问卷工具似乎是可行的,并且在三年级住院医师样本中得出的分数具有合理的可靠性和有效性证据。