Suppr超能文献

医学院毕业生项目主任(导师)评估表的可行性、可靠性和有效性。

The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a program director's (supervisor's) evaluation form for medical school graduates.

作者信息

Durning Steven J, Pangaro Louis N, Lawrence Linda L, Waechter Donna, McManigle John, Jackson Jeffrey L

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2005 Oct;80(10):964-8. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200510000-00018.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the supervisor's evaluation form for first-year residents as an outcome measure for programmatic evaluation.

METHOD

Prospective feedback has been sought from supervisors for the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (USUHS) graduates during their internship year. Supervisors are sent yearly evaluation forms with up to three additional mailings. Using a six-point scale, supervisors rate residents on 18 items. The authors used evaluation data from 1993 to 2002. Feasibility was estimated by response rate. Internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and analyzing scores on a year-to-year and interrater basis. Validity was determined by exploratory factor analysis with oblique rotations, comparing ratings with end-of-medical school GPA and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 and Step 2 scores (Pearson correlations), and by analyzing the range of scores to include the percentage of scores below acceptable level.

RESULTS

A total of 1,247 evaluations were collected for the 1,559 USUHS graduates (80%). Cronbach's alpha was .96 with no significant difference in scores by supervisor specialty or year. Factor analysis found that the evaluation form collapsed into two domains accounting for 68% of the variance: professionalism and expertise. End-of-medical school GPA and USMLE Step 1 and 2 scores correlated with expertise but not with professionalism. Mean scores across items were 3.5-4.31 with a median of 4.0 for all items (SD .80-1.21). Four percent of graduates received less-than-satisfactory ratings.

CONCLUSIONS

This evaluation form has high feasibility and internal consistency. Factory analysis revealed two complimentary domains supporting its validity. Correlation with end-of-medical school measurements and analysis of range of scores supports the form's validity.

摘要

目的

确定主管对一年级住院医师的评估表作为项目评估结果指标的可行性、可靠性和有效性。

方法

已向健康科学统一服务大学(USUHS)毕业生实习期间的主管寻求前瞻性反馈。每年向主管发送评估表,最多额外邮寄三次。主管使用六点量表对住院医师的18项内容进行评分。作者使用了1993年至2002年的评估数据。通过回复率评估可行性。通过计算克朗巴哈系数并在逐年和评分者间基础上分析分数来评估内部一致性。通过进行斜交旋转的探索性因素分析、将评分与医学院校期末平均绩点以及美国医学执照考试(USMLE)第一步和第二步的分数进行比较(皮尔逊相关性),并分析分数范围以包括低于可接受水平的分数百分比来确定有效性。

结果

共收集到1559名USUHS毕业生的1247份评估(80%)。克朗巴哈系数为0.96,主管专业或年份的分数无显著差异。因素分析发现评估表可归纳为两个领域,占方差的68%:职业素养和专业技能。医学院校期末平均绩点以及USMLE第一步和第二步的分数与专业技能相关,但与职业素养无关。所有项目的平均分数为3.5 - 4.31,中位数为4.0(标准差0.80 - 1.21)。4%的毕业生获得了不满意的评分。

结论

该评估表具有较高的可行性和内部一致性。因素分析揭示了两个互补领域,支持其有效性。与医学院校期末测量结果的相关性以及分数范围分析支持了该表格的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验