Huang Lyen C, Tran Thuy B, Ma Yifei, Ngo Justine V, Rhoads Kim F
1 Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 2 Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 May;58(5):526-32. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000353.
Previous studies suggest that minorities cluster in low-quality hospitals despite living close to better performing hospitals. This may contribute to persistent disparities in cancer outcomes.
The purpose of this work was to examine how travel distance, insurance status, and neighborhood socioeconomic factors influenced minority underuse of high-volume hospitals for colorectal cancer.
The study was a retrospective, cross-sectional, population-based study.
All hospitals in California from 1996 to 2006 were included.
Patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed and treated in California between 1996 and 2006 were identified using California Cancer Registry data.
Multivariable logistic regression models predicting high-volume hospital use were adjusted for age, sex, race, stage, comorbidities, insurance status, and neighborhood socioeconomic factors.
A total of 79,231 patients treated in 417 hospitals were included in the study. High-volume hospitals were independently associated with an 8% decrease in the hazard of death compared with other settings. A lower proportion of minorities used high-volume hospitals despite a higher proportion living nearby. Although insurance status and socioeconomic factors were independently associated with high-volume hospital use, only socioeconomic factors attenuated differences in high-volume hospital use of black and Hispanic patients compared with white patients.
The use of cross-sectional data and racial and ethnic misclassifications were limitations in this study.
Minority patients do not use high-volume hospitals despite improved outcomes and geographic access. Low socioeconomic status predicts low use of high-volume settings in select minority groups. Our results provide a roadmap for developing interventions to increase the use of and access to higher quality care and outcomes. Increasing minority use of high-volume hospitals may require community outreach programs and changes in physician referral practices.
先前的研究表明,少数族裔人群虽居住在医疗表现较好的医院附近,但却集中在质量较低的医院就医。这可能导致癌症治疗结果方面长期存在差异。
本研究旨在探讨出行距离、保险状况及社区社会经济因素如何影响少数族裔人群对治疗结直肠癌的大型医院的利用不足情况。
本研究为一项基于人群的回顾性横断面研究。
纳入了1996年至2006年加利福尼亚州的所有医院。
利用加利福尼亚癌症登记数据确定了1996年至2006年间在加利福尼亚州被诊断并接受治疗的结直肠癌患者。
针对预测大型医院利用情况的多变量逻辑回归模型,对年龄、性别、种族、疾病分期、合并症、保险状况及社区社会经济因素进行了校正。
本研究纳入了在417家医院接受治疗的79231例患者。与其他医院相比,大型医院可使死亡风险独立降低8%。尽管居住在大型医院附近的少数族裔比例较高,但使用大型医院的少数族裔比例较低。虽然保险状况和社会经济因素与大型医院的利用独立相关,但与白人患者相比,只有社会经济因素缩小了黑人和西班牙裔患者在大型医院利用方面的差异。
本研究的局限性在于使用了横断面数据以及存在种族和民族误分类情况。
尽管大型医院治疗效果较好且地理位置便利,但少数族裔患者并未选择前往就医。低社会经济地位预示着特定少数族裔群体对大型医院的利用率较低。我们的研究结果为制定干预措施提供了路线图,以增加对更高质量医疗服务的利用并改善治疗结果。提高少数族裔对大型医院的利用率可能需要开展社区外展项目并改变医生的转诊做法。