Jaspersen Johannes G, Montibeller Gilberto
Munich School of Management, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität of Munich, Schackstr. 4, 80539, Munich, Germany.
School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK.
Risk Anal. 2015 Jul;35(7):1317-35. doi: 10.1111/risa.12357. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Probability elicitation protocols are used to assess and incorporate subjective probabilities in risk and decision analysis. While most of these protocols use methods that have focused on the precision of the elicited probabilities, the speed of the elicitation process has often been neglected. However, speed is also important, particularly when experts need to examine a large number of events on a recurrent basis. Furthermore, most existing elicitation methods are numerical in nature, but there are various reasons why an expert would refuse to give such precise ratio-scale estimates, even if highly numerate. This may occur, for instance, when there is lack of sufficient hard evidence, when assessing very uncertain events (such as emergent threats), or when dealing with politicized topics (such as terrorism or disease outbreaks). In this article, we adopt an ordinal ranking approach from multicriteria decision analysis to provide a fast and nonnumerical probability elicitation process. Probabilities are subsequently approximated from the ranking by an algorithm based on the principle of maximum entropy, a rule compatible with the ordinal information provided by the expert. The method can elicit probabilities for a wide range of different event types, including new ways of eliciting probabilities for stochastically independent events and low-probability events. We use a Monte Carlo simulation to test the accuracy of the approximated probabilities and try the method in practice, applying it to a real-world risk analysis recently conducted for DEFRA (the U.K. Department for the Environment, Farming and Rural Affairs): the prioritization of animal health threats.
概率诱导协议用于在风险和决策分析中评估和纳入主观概率。虽然这些协议大多使用专注于诱导概率精度的方法,但诱导过程的速度却常常被忽视。然而,速度也很重要,特别是当专家需要反复检查大量事件时。此外,现有的大多数诱导方法本质上都是数值性的,但即使专家精通数字,也有各种原因会导致他们拒绝给出如此精确的比率尺度估计。例如,当缺乏足够的确凿证据时、评估非常不确定的事件(如突发威胁)时,或处理政治化话题(如恐怖主义或疾病爆发)时,就可能出现这种情况。在本文中,我们采用多准则决策分析中的序数排序方法,以提供一个快速且非数值性的概率诱导过程。随后,基于最大熵原理的算法根据排序来近似概率,该规则与专家提供的序数信息兼容。该方法可以为广泛的不同事件类型诱导概率,包括为随机独立事件和低概率事件诱导概率的新方法。我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟来测试近似概率的准确性,并在实践中尝试该方法,将其应用于最近为英国环境、食品和农村事务部(DEFRA)进行的一项实际风险分析:动物健康威胁的优先级排序。