Suppr超能文献

记录 2:依维莫司和贝伐珠单抗与干扰素 α-2a 和贝伐珠单抗作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的 II 期随机研究。

RECORD-2: phase II randomized study of everolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon α-2a and bevacizumab as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Saint Andre Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France

Department of Medicine, PUCRS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1378-84. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv170. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The open-label, phase II RECORD-2 trial compared efficacy and safety of first-line everolimus plus bevacizumab (EVE/BEV) with interferon plus bevacizumab (IFN/BEV) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Previously untreated patients were randomized 1:1 to bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks with either everolimus 10 mg/day (EVE/BEV) or interferon (9 MIU 3 times/week, if tolerated) (IFN/BEV). Tumor assessments occurred every 12 weeks. The primary objective was the assessment of treatment effect on progression-free survival (PFS), based on an estimate of the chance of a subsequent phase III trial success (50% threshold for phase II success).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were balanced between the EVE/BEV (n = 182) and IFN/BEV (n = 183) arms. The median PFS was 9.3 and 10.0 months in the EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV arms, respectively (P = 0.485). The predicted probability of phase III success was 5.05% (hazard ratio = 0.91; 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.19). The median duration of exposure was 8.5 and 8.3 months for EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV, respectively. The percentage of patients discontinuing because of adverse events (AEs) was 23.4% for EVE/BEV and 26.9% for IFN/BEV. Common grade 3/4 AEs included proteinuria (24.4%), stomatitis (10.6%), and anemia (10.6%) for EVE/BEV and fatigue (17.1%), asthenia (14.4%), and proteinuria (10.5%) for IFN/BEV. The median overall survival was 27.1 months in both arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of EVE/BEV and IFN/BEV appears similar. No new or unexpected safety findings were identified and, with the exception of proteinuria in about one-fourth of the population, EVE/BEV was generally well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY AND TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00719264.

摘要

背景

开放标签、二期 RECORD-2 试验比较了转移性肾细胞癌患者一线依维莫司联合贝伐单抗(EVE/BEV)与干扰素联合贝伐单抗(IFN/BEV)的疗效和安全性。

患者和方法

未经治疗的患者按 1:1 随机分配,分别接受贝伐单抗 10mg/kg,每 2 周 1 次,联合依维莫司 10mg/天(EVE/BEV)或干扰素(IFN/BEV,9 MIU 每周 3 次,如果耐受)。每 12 周进行肿瘤评估。主要终点是根据后续三期试验成功的可能性(二期成功的 50%阈值)评估无进展生存期(PFS)的治疗效果。

结果

EVE/BEV(n=182)和 IFN/BEV(n=183)组之间的基线特征平衡。EVE/BEV 和 IFN/BEV 组的中位 PFS 分别为 9.3 和 10.0 个月(P=0.485)。三期成功的预测概率为 5.05%(风险比=0.91;95%置信区间 0.69-1.19)。EVE/BEV 和 IFN/BEV 的中位暴露持续时间分别为 8.5 和 8.3 个月。因不良事件(AE)而停药的患者比例分别为 23.4%(EVE/BEV)和 26.9%(IFN/BEV)。常见的 3/4 级 AE 包括蛋白尿(24.4%)、口腔炎(10.6%)和贫血(10.6%)(EVE/BEV)和疲劳(17.1%)、乏力(14.4%)和蛋白尿(10.5%)(IFN/BEV)。两个治疗组的中位总生存期均为 27.1 个月。

结论

EVE/BEV 和 IFN/BEV 的疗效似乎相似。未发现新的或意外的安全性发现,除了大约四分之一的人群出现蛋白尿外,EVE/BEV 通常耐受性良好。

临床试验注册号和临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT00719264。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验